no included

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no included" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "not included"? You can use "not included" to indicate that something is excluded from a list, group, or category. Example: "The price of the ticket is $50, but meals are not included."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

33 human-written examples

The S730 got dinged for its slightly-sluggish 400MHz processor and 64MB of RAM, Home Screen UI quirkiness, and the fact that there's no included hands-free kit — it must be purchased for £14.95.

TechCrunch

Category 'yes' included participants with responses 2 and 5. 'No' included the remaining responses.

BMC Infectious Diseases

The last question respondent could answer with "yes" or "no" ("no" included no, I do not know and missed answer).

BMC Public Health

Use the included RCA cables (no included component cables = no HD) or buy the HDMI dock if you want to watch stuff in high definition.

TechCrunch

Of note, no included TIMI-0 patient with initial TnI <99th percentile had a biomarker rise at 2 h or the standard testing interval.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

The biggest issue with the Quickfire – and one that could easily be fixed – is that it's touted as a music-friendly phone, yet there are no included headphones and no 2.5- or 3.5-mm headphone jack.

TechCrunch

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

27 human-written examples

Do no include background tracks or instruments.

WikiHow

Tips are no longer included.

The New York Times - Travel

Plans no longer includes provision for cyclists.

The Guardian

Illinois Republican "no" voters including Reps.

Huffington Post

No political clauses were included.

Wikipedia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "not included" instead of "no included" to ensure grammatical correctness in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "no" as a direct substitute for "not" before a past participle like "included". "No" typically modifies a noun, whereas "not" modifies a verb or participle. So, prefer "The meal is not included" over *"No meal is included" (this is grammatically correct but semantically changes the meaning - now "no meal" is a single noun object).

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no included" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Its intended function is typically to express that something is not part of a set or list, or that something is excluded. Ludwig AI highlights the correct usage is "not included".

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "no included" appears in some sources, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. The intended meaning is to indicate exclusion, but the correct form is "not included". As Ludwig AI clarifies, sticking to "not included", "excluded", or similar alternatives will ensure clarity and professionalism in your writing. It's worth noting that while the phrase appears across different domains, Science and News & Media being the most frequent ones, it is still regarded as uncommon.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not included

This is the most direct and grammatically sound replacement, simply negating the inclusion.

was not included

Adds past tense to specify a past exclusion.

is not included

Adds present tense to specify a present exclusion.

are not included

Addresses plural subjects that are excluded.

lacking inclusion

Uses a gerund phrase to describe the absence of inclusion.

without inclusion

Expresses the state of being excluded, highlighting the lack of inclusion.

not featuring

Indicates the absence of a particular feature or element.

omitted from

Highlights the act of leaving something out.

excluded from

Directly states that something is kept out or prevented from being part of a group.

absent from

Indicates the lack of presence in a set or list.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "no included"?

The grammatically correct way to express that something is not part of a set or list is to say "not included".

Can I use "no included" in formal writing?

No, it is best to avoid "no included" in formal writing. Use "not included" or "excluded" instead to maintain a professional tone.

What's the difference between "not included" and "excluded"?

"Not included" is a direct negation of inclusion, while "excluded" implies a deliberate act of keeping something out. The choice depends on the specific context.

Is there a situation where "no included" would be correct?

While generally incorrect, you might encounter it in very informal speech or as a non-standard abbreviation, but it's best to avoid it in written communication. Always opt for "not included" or a similar phrase for clarity.