no harmful consequences

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no harmful consequences" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing actions, decisions, or events that do not result in negative effects or harm. Example: "The new policy was implemented with the assurance that it would have no harmful consequences for the employees."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

There were no harmful consequences in either test case, and in fact, the results were so effective that there are plans for additional larger-scale tests.

The Washington Post

But and I'm going to retest you on this in a moment when I asked you on March 3rd whether Lucky Cell Phone, somebody who did a slightly risky thing with no harmful consequences had done something morally culpable, 78% of you said that he did.

Yale University

Let me illustrate this for the three studies that are most often cited to support the claim that direct-to-consumer DNA testing has no harmful consequences.

HuffPost

"A lot of us played with toy guns as children" with no harmful consequences, said Los Angeles-based child psychologist Robert Butterworth.

Los Angeles Times

Potassium and platelet levels went down a little, but with no harmful consequences.

Critical Care

Performing chemotherapy in ICU, with ERR if necessary, seems possible with no harmful consequences.

Critical Care

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

While false negatives were not observed, false positives (ca. 18%) have no harmful consequence (Springer et al, 2003a).

British Journal of Cancer

This would work as long as there were not any harmful consequences, but who will guarantee that?

The New York Times

This showed that neither the prospective nor the surrogate parents had experienced major negative or harmful consequences, even if no child was born.

Human Reproduction

It has vast, harmful consequences.

The New Yorker

This will have two harmful consequences.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "no harmful consequences", ensure the context clearly establishes what action or event is being evaluated for potential harm. Clarity is key to conveying the intended meaning.

Common error

Avoid assuming that the absence of observed harmful consequences automatically confirms their non-existence. Thorough investigation and long-term monitoring are often necessary to definitively establish that "no harmful consequences" will arise.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no harmful consequences" functions as a postmodifier, typically following a verb or noun phrase to indicate the absence of negative outcomes resulting from a specific action, event, or situation. As Ludwig AI confirms, its meaning is straightforward and commonly understood.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Academia

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no harmful consequences" is a grammatically correct and understandable expression used to convey the absence of negative effects. While Ludwig AI indicates its usability, the analysis shows it is 'uncommon' in frequency, appearing across various domains like news, science, and academia. When employing this phrase, ensure context is clear and the claim is supported by evidence. Alternatives such as "no adverse effects" or "no negative outcomes" might be suitable depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no adverse effects

Replaces "consequences" with "effects", maintaining a similar level of formality and meaning but slightly more general.

no negative outcomes

Substitutes "harmful consequences" with "negative outcomes", emphasizing the result without explicitly mentioning harm.

without detrimental results

Uses a more formal tone by employing "detrimental results" instead of "harmful consequences".

no ill effects

Replaces "harmful consequences" with the idiomatic expression "ill effects", offering a slightly less formal tone.

no damaging repercussions

Employs "damaging repercussions" for a stronger emphasis on the potential for severe negative outcomes.

without adverse impact

Uses the term "adverse impact", often used in formal or technical contexts to indicate a negative effect.

no negative ramifications

Substitutes "consequences" with "ramifications", which suggests more far-reaching and complex negative effects.

no serious sequelae

Employs the medical term "sequelae", referring to conditions resulting from a disease or injury, which is highly specific.

no deleterious effects

Uses "deleterious effects", which is a more formal and scientific way of saying "harmful consequences".

without causing harm

Shifts the focus to the action of causing harm, rather than the resulting consequences.

FAQs

What does "no harmful consequences" mean?

The phrase "no harmful consequences" means that a particular action, event, or situation does not result in any negative or damaging effects.

How can I use "no harmful consequences" in a sentence?

You can use "no harmful consequences" to describe situations where there are no negative outcomes. For example: "The experiment was conducted with the assurance that it would have "no harmful consequences" for the environment."

Are there alternatives to "no harmful consequences"?

Yes, you can use alternatives like "no adverse effects", "no negative outcomes", or "without detrimental results" depending on the context.

Is it always accurate to claim "no harmful consequences"?

It's important to exercise caution when claiming "no harmful consequences". Thorough assessment and monitoring are often necessary to confidently assert the absence of any negative effects. Consider if "no ill effects" is a more appropriate alternative.