no discrepancy was found

USAGE SUMMARY

The sentence "no discrepancy was found" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are trying to report that you did not find any differences or inconsistencies between two or more things. For example: "We conducted a thorough audit of the company's financial records, but no discrepancy was found."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

However, no discrepancy was found in streptomycin- and HBD3-incubated group (Fig. 4e).

AMB Express

However, no discrepancy was found in the repeat tests.

BMC Veterinary Research

No discrepancy was found between these and the subtyping results of the virus isolates from NPAs.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

No discrepancy was found when Sanger sequencing 15 selected variants over 20% of clonal size.

Blood Cancer Journal

No discrepancy was found in samples (13/56) containing low levels of CDV (Ct > 35, real-time RT-PCR, indicating that the established method reliably detects low amounts of CDV in clinical samples.

BMC Veterinary Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Information from EST sequences was used when any discrepancy was found.

BMC Plant Biology

If any discrepancy was found, modifications and specifications were made to the questionnaire following expert recommendations.

BMC Health Services Research

No discrepancies were found between the array typing and the genotype identity confirmed by nucleotide sequencing of the PCR product.

Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

Note that the proposed values differ from the exact values only in three cases (out of total 39 cases): N=12,24 for α=0.9 (Fig. 8) and N=16 for α=0.92 (Fig. 9) while no discrepancies are found for α=0.98 (Fig. 10).

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Again, no discrepancies were found.

Plosone

No discrepancies were found using phylogenetic analysis or matching with Blast.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting results, follow "no discrepancy was found" with specifics. Instead of just stating "no discrepancy was found", add the items or groups that you are comparing, which would increase clarity to your audience.

Common error

While grammatically correct, excessive use of passive voice (like "no discrepancy was found") can make your writing sound less direct. Consider rephrasing to an active voice construction like "we found no discrepancy" for a more engaging tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no discrepancy was found" functions as a statement indicating the absence of any inconsistency or difference between compared items. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically sound and suitable for formal writing.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no discrepancy was found" is a grammatically correct and usable expression to indicate the absence of inconsistencies between compared items. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, primarily in formal and scientific writing. While its frequency is relatively low, it effectively communicates a negative finding in contexts where data integrity is crucial. Alternatives like "no difference was detected" or "the results were consistent" can be considered for stylistic variation. Ensure clarity by specifying what items or groups are being compared when employing this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no difference was detected

Focuses on the absence of detectable differences, often in a scientific or analytical context.

no inconsistency was observed

Highlights the lack of inconsistencies, suitable when comparing related data or observations.

no variation was noted

Emphasizes the lack of variation between different measurements or conditions.

no difference was apparent

Suggests that no difference could be easily perceived or recognized.

no disparity was evident

Indicates the absence of any significant difference or inequality.

the results were consistent

Emphasizes that the outcomes align and do not contradict each other.

the findings were uniform

Highlights the sameness or lack of deviation in the results.

there were no contradictions

Directly states the absence of conflicting information or results.

agreement was observed

Highlights the presence of matching or similar results.

no conflict was identified

Focuses on the absence of conflicting elements, such as data or opinions.

FAQs

What does "no discrepancy was found" mean?

The phrase "no discrepancy was found" means that after comparing two or more sets of data, results, or observations, there were no significant differences or inconsistencies detected.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "no discrepancy was found"?

It is appropriate to use "no discrepancy was found" in formal contexts such as scientific reports, research papers, and official documentation when you need to clearly state that there were no inconsistencies in the data analyzed.

What are some alternatives to saying "no discrepancy was found"?

Alternatives to "no discrepancy was found" include phrases like "no difference was detected", "no inconsistency was observed", or "the results were consistent", which can provide similar meaning with slightly different emphasis.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when reporting that there were no discrepancies?

While "no discrepancy was found" (passive voice) is correct, using active voice such as "we found no discrepancy" can make your writing more direct and engaging. The choice depends on the desired tone and context.