no correlation between

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no correlation between" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the lack of a relationship or connection between two variables or factors in a study or analysis. Example: "The research findings indicated that there was no correlation between exercise frequency and weight loss among the participants."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There is no correlation between the two.

The New York Times

There's no correlation between the two".

The New York Times

There actually is almost no correlation between perfectionism and procrastination.

The New York Times

"There's really no correlation between the two," Nugent said.

The New York Times - Sports

There is no correlation between information and behavior change.

The New York Times - Magazine

"There's no correlation between runs scored and stolen bases".

The New York Times - Sports

There is no correlation between happiness and amounts of money".

The Guardian - Music

In health care, there's really no correlation between the two.

The Washington Post

No correlation between PTEN status and RAD51 expression.

Nature

There is no correlation between vaccines and autism," she said.

The Guardian

There's no correlation between belt size and skill.

Harvard University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "no correlation between", clearly define the two variables or factors you are discussing to avoid ambiguity. For example, "There is no correlation between study time and test scores in this particular group."

Common error

Avoid implying causation when stating "no correlation between". Just because two variables don't move together doesn't mean one couldn't influence the other through indirect mechanisms or other factors.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no correlation between" functions as a statement of statistical independence. Ludwig AI confirms its validity as a means of asserting that two or more variables exhibit no predictable relationship. Examples show its application in diverse fields, from economics to health science.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

32%

Academia

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "no correlation between" is a standard way to indicate that two variables or factors do not have a statistical relationship. Ludwig AI confirms that it's grammatically correct and very commonly used in varied contexts, including news, science, and academia. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly define the variables involved to avoid ambiguity. While the phrase is often used in neutral to formal registers, it's essential not to assume causation simply because there's no correlation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not correlated with

A more technical term indicating that variables do not change together.

no association between

Emphasizes the absence of a direct link or connection.

no connection between

Similar to "no association", but emphasizes a broader lack of linkage.

not related to

Highlights the lack of a relationship between subjects.

independent of

Focuses on the concept of one variable not being influenced by another.

unrelated to

Directly states that no relation exists between two things.

not linked to

Suggests the absence of a connection or link between items.

is not dependent on

Focuses on the idea that one thing does not rely on another.

lacks a relationship with

Highlights the absence of an existing relationship.

bears no relation to

A more formal way of expressing that two things are unrelated.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "no correlation between"?

You can use phrases like "no association between", "not related to", or "independent of" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "there is no correlation between X and Y"?

Yes, the phrase "no correlation between" is grammatically correct and widely used to indicate the absence of a statistical relationship between two variables.

What does "no correlation between" imply in research?

In research, "no correlation between" suggests that changes in one variable do not predictably correspond with changes in another variable, meaning they are statistically unrelated.

What is the difference between "no correlation between" and "negative correlation"?

"No correlation between" means there is no discernible relationship, while "negative correlation" implies that as one variable increases, the other decreases. They are distinct statistical relationships.