no correlation

USAGE SUMMARY

"no correlation" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that two things do not have a connection or relationship. For example, "There is no correlation between the amount of money spent on advertising and sales."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There's no correlation".

The Guardian - Music

"There is no correlation.

Independent

There was absolutely no correlation.

The New York Times - Magazine

Often there is no correlation.

The Economist

Half show no correlation at all.

The Guardian - Opinion

There's no correlation between the two".

The New York Times

Another, looking at cancer, found no correlation.

The New York Times

Simply put, there's almost no correlation.

The Washington Post

"Basically, it gave no correlation at all".

The New York Times - Science

No correlation was found among adults.

The New York Times

There is no correlation between the two.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "no correlation", ensure you clearly specify the two or more variables or concepts between which the absence of a relationship is being stated. This enhances clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

A common mistake is assuming that if there's no correlation, then one thing cannot possibly influence the other. Remember, absence of correlation doesn't always mean absence of causation; other factors might be involved, or the relationship might be non-linear.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no correlation" primarily functions as a noun phrase expressing the absence of a statistical relationship or connection between two or more variables. Ludwig AI confirms this usage across numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

35%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no correlation" effectively conveys the absence of a statistical relationship between two variables. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and widely used across various fields, particularly in science and news media. While there are several alternatives, such as "no relationship" or "not related", it's crucial to specify the variables being discussed to maintain clarity. Remember that just because there's "no correlation", it does not automatically negate the possibility of influence or connection through other means.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

uncorrelated

A more concise and formal way of saying "no correlation".

no relationship

Focuses on the absence of any kind of relationship, broader than a statistical correlation.

no connection

Similar to "no relationship", but can also refer to a physical or causal connection.

no association

Similar to "no relationship", but often used in scientific or medical contexts.

not related

A simpler, more direct way to state the lack of a connection.

not linked

Highlights the absence of a link or connection between two things.

lacking any connection

Emphasizes the complete absence of a relationship.

independent of each other

Emphasizes the separate and unconnected nature of the items being discussed.

not indicative of

Indicates that one thing does not predict or reflect another.

no bearing on

Suggests that one thing has no influence or effect on another.

FAQs

How can I use "no correlation" in a sentence?

You can use "no correlation" to indicate that there is no statistical relationship between two variables. For example, "There is "no correlation" between education level and income in this particular study".

What are some alternatives to "no correlation"?

Alternatives to "no correlation" include "no relationship", "not related", or "independent of each other". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "there are no correlation"?

No, it is not grammatically correct. The correct phrasing is "there is "no correlation"" because "correlation" is a singular noun in this context.

What does it mean when a study finds "no correlation"?

When a study finds "no correlation", it means that the researchers did not find a statistically significant relationship between the variables they were studying. This doesn't necessarily mean there's absolutely no connection, but that the data didn't provide evidence of one.