no complicity

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no complicity" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate a lack of involvement or association in wrongdoing or unethical behavior. Example: "The investigation revealed that there was no complicity on the part of the accused in the fraudulent activities."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

"There is no complicity.

The Guardian

The city investigation report suggests no complicity by city officials.

The New York Times

"There is no complicity" in Ms. Bhutto's killing, he said.

The New York Times

"There was no complicity here," she said, echoing Mr. Kobler's phrase.

The New York Times

He said there had been "no torture and no complicity in torture" by Britain's intelligence agencies, as several former detainees at the United States camp at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, have alleged.

The New York Times

"I'm happy that it reports that there was no corruption and no complicity in relation to doping.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

But in his closing arguments, the prosecutor, Nicola Picardi, said the investigation turned up no proof of any complicity in Gabriele's scheme.

Independent

When he was freed, however, the king's complicity could no longer be denied.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Racial disparities in income and employment widened dramatically, no longer requiring the complicity of some racist ogre but smoothly perpetuated through an economic system geared to produce inequality.

The Washington Post

No more American involvement in Middle East wars but no more passive complicity in genocide.

The New York Times

But there will be no avoiding congressional complicity in the shattering of yet another norm of office, check and balance.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "no complicity", be prepared to substantiate the claim with evidence or reasoning, as it often implies a denial of serious accusations.

Common error

Avoid using "no complicity" when simply indicating a lack of direct action. Complicity implies indirect involvement or knowing assistance in wrongdoing, not merely a lack of participation. If there was only lack of participation then better use alternatives like "no involvement" or similar.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no complicity" functions as a declaration or assertion, used to deny any involvement or association with an act of wrongdoing. It is often used in formal statements or legal contexts to negate any implication of shared responsibility. Ludwig AI confirms the usability of the phrase.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

62.5%

Encyclopedias

12.5%

Academia

7.5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Science

2.5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no complicity" is used to firmly deny involvement or shared responsibility in a wrongdoing. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct. It's most commonly found in news and media contexts and carries a neutral to formal tone. When writing, ensure that the use of the phrase is appropriate for situations where there's an implication of shared blame, and be prepared to back up the statement with evidence. Consider alternatives like "no involvement" or "no responsibility" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no involvement

Focuses on the absence of participation in an action, rather than specifically denying shared guilt.

no culpability

Highlights the absence of blameworthiness or guilt in a situation.

no responsibility

Emphasizes the lack of obligation or accountability for an action or event.

not implicated

Indicates that someone or something is not connected to or involved in a negative situation.

no part in

Directly states the absence of participation in a particular activity.

no connection

Highlights the lack of a link or association with something, suggesting non-involvement.

not associated with

Formally states that there is no affiliation or link to a person, group, or event.

no knowledge of

Denies awareness or information about an event or activity, implying non-involvement.

not privy to

Indicates that someone was not part of confidential or secret information related to an event.

completely uninvolved

Stresses a total lack of participation or connection to an event or situation.

FAQs

How can I use "no complicity" in a sentence?

You can use "no complicity" to assert that someone or something is not involved in wrongdoing. For example, "The investigation revealed there was "no complicity" on the part of the city officials."

What is a synonym for "no complicity"?

Alternatives to "no complicity" include "no involvement", "no culpability", or "no responsibility". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "no complicity" or "not complicit"?

"No complicity" is generally used as a phrase to deny involvement, while "not complicit" is an adjective phrase to describe someone's state. Both are grammatically correct, but the choice depends on the sentence structure. Example: There is "no complicity"; the person is "not complicit".

What does "no complicity" imply?

"No complicity" implies a firm denial of any involvement, direct or indirect, in a wrongdoing or unethical activity. It suggests a lack of shared responsibility or guilt.