no adequate

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no adequate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the absence of sufficient quality, quantity, or standard in a particular context. Example: "The report was deemed unsatisfactory due to no adequate evidence supporting the claims made."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Trouble lay in no adequate lighting systems.

The New Yorker

There are no adequate bike lanes.

The Guardian

It is just that there is no adequate framework within which to incorporate them.

The Guardian

No! I just.... huh?' I'm talking about when there are no adequate words.

The Guardian

He said there was no adequate interpretation and Mann did not understand most of the proceedings.

The Guardian - Sport

There is no adequate precedent for making a decision in this case.

The New Yorker

But the truncated debate meant there were no adequate answers given on these issues.

The New York Times

For these children of misfortune, there could be no adequate substitute".

The Guardian

Too many, including school leaders, receive no adequate training once they join a school.

The Guardian

"I see now," he wrote miserably, "why there are no adequate translations of Homer.

The New York Times - Books

When it broke down we formed Efta, but that was no adequate solution, political or economic.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "no adequate", ensure the context clearly defines what standard or requirement is not being met. This helps avoid ambiguity.

Common error

While acceptable, "no adequate" can sometimes sound less formal. In highly formal writing, consider stronger alternatives like "insufficient" or "inadequate" for a more impactful statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no adequate" functions as an adjective phrase used to modify a noun, indicating a deficiency in quality, quantity, or suitability. As Ludwig AI confirms, the structure follows standard grammar rules, making it a clear and usable phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

44%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no adequate" functions as an adjective phrase that effectively conveys a lack of sufficiency or suitability. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English. While versatile across diverse contexts, from formal business to scientific discussions, it's most prevalent in news and media. When aiming for heightened formality, consider using alternatives such as "insufficient" or "inadequate". The most authoritative sources using this phrase include The Guardian and The New York Times, marking its reliability and widespread use.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

insufficient

Single-word replacement; direct synonym indicating a lack of what is needed.

not enough

Simple phrase indicating a quantity or quality below what is required.

lacking sufficient

Rephrasing that emphasizes the absence of a necessary amount or degree.

inadequate

Single-word replacement; emphasizes that something is not good enough for a particular purpose.

deficient

Single-word replacement; indicates a lack of something essential or required.

not up to par

Idiomatic expression meaning not meeting the required standard or expectation.

falling short

Phrase indicating a failure to reach a required level or standard.

not meeting requirements

Formal phrasing indicating that something does not satisfy the necessary criteria.

substandard

Single-word replacement; indicating something below the expected or required standard.

poor

Simple term indicating a low quality or insufficient amount.

FAQs

How can I use "no adequate" in a sentence?

You can use "no adequate" to describe a situation where something lacks the necessary quality or quantity. For example, "There was "no adequate" preparation for the exam."

What are some alternatives to saying "no adequate"?

Alternatives to "no adequate" include "insufficient", "inadequate", or "lacking sufficient" resources.

Which is correct, "no adequate" or "not adequate"?

Both "no adequate" and "not adequate" are grammatically acceptable, but "no adequate" is often used when directly preceding the noun it modifies. The choice depends on the specific sentence structure.

What is the difference between "no adequate" and "no sufficient"?

"No adequate" suggests a lack of required quality or standard, while "no sufficient" implies a lack of the required amount or degree. Therefore, you should use "no sufficient" when referring to quantity and ""no adequate"" when talking about quality.