Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

no additional cost

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"no additional cost" is correct and usable in written English.
It is often used when referring to services that are offered at no extra charge. For example, "We are offering a free Tune-Up Service with no additional cost."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

No additional cost.

There was no additional cost to the taxpayer".

3 snapshots per virtual server at no additional cost.

Turnitin is available at no additional cost to faculty.

This service is provided at no additional cost.

Housing accommodations will be provided at no additional cost.

"There is no additional cost to the taxpayers," said Anne Womack, a White House spokeswoman.

News & Media

The New York Times

There is no additional cost or government subsidy in the bill.

News & Media

The New York Times

"Even if the buyer does want the furniture, they expect it at no additional cost".

News & Media

The New York Times

VoIP offers all of those frills and more at no additional cost.

"There would be no additional cost to a federal program to take advantage of this".

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When highlighting a benefit, use "no additional cost" to clearly communicate that there are no hidden fees or unexpected charges. This builds trust with your audience.

Common error

Avoid using "no additional cost" when there are associated conditions or limitations. If a service is only free under certain circumstances, specify those conditions clearly to prevent confusion and maintain transparency.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.7/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no additional cost" functions primarily as an adjective phrase modifying a noun, indicating that something is provided without any extra charge. Ludwig AI confirms this through numerous examples where it modifies services, features, or products.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

33%

News & Media

56%

Science

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "no additional cost" is a common and grammatically correct way to indicate that something is available without extra charges. Ludwig AI's analysis reveals that it is used frequently across various contexts, including academia, news, and science. Its primary function is to assure audiences of value and transparency, promoting trust by clarifying that there are no hidden fees. When using this phrase, ensure that it accurately reflects the situation, as misinterpretations can lead to confusion. Alternatives such as "free of charge" or "at no extra charge" may also be appropriate, depending on the desired tone and context.

FAQs

How can I use "no additional cost" in a sentence?

You can use "no additional cost" to emphasize that a product, feature, or service is included without any extra charges. For example, "The software update is available at "no additional cost" to existing users."

What are some alternatives to saying "no additional cost"?

Alternatives to "no additional cost" include "free of charge", "at no extra charge", and "included without charge". Choose the phrasing that best fits the context and tone of your writing.

Is it redundant to say "no additional cost free"?

Yes, saying "no additional cost free" is redundant because "no additional cost" already implies that it is free. It's best to stick with either ""no additional cost"" or simply "free".

What's the difference between "no additional cost" and "included"?

"Included" simply means that something is part of a package or offering. "No additional cost" emphasizes that there are no extra charges for that particular item or service. Both terms can often be used interchangeably, but the latter is more specific about the financial aspect.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.7/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: