neutralised by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "neutralised by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been made ineffective or countered by another factor or action. Example: "The effects of the medication were neutralised by the presence of certain foods in the patient's diet."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Some people may believe the effects of the alcohol are being neutralised by the caffeine".

The Guardian - Business

More likely, I think, is that his lo-fi style would be neutralised by conspicuous success.

The Guardian

But much of the federal effort has been neutralised by state and local cuts.

The Economist

But the continuation of US human rights sanctions would be easily brushed aside or neutralised by the Islamic Republic.

The Guardian

What is terrifying is the idea that anyone could have their free will neutralised by nefarious agents of evil.

The Guardian - Opinion

The slight edge Mr Romney enjoys in enthusiasm may be neutralised by the stronger organisation of Mr Obama's ground campaign.

The Economist

A fourth group, has been neutralised by the government; a success for which the international community has not given credit.

The Economist

Instead, it is a dynamic system, in which a tactic that works against one approach can be neutralised by another.

The Economist

It was great to see that talent of individual players can be neutralised by a good organisation and strategy.

The Economist

Violent gender-specific emotions – hatred of one's own body, for instance – are recognised in the same moment as being neutralised by humour.

The Guardian - Books

At the end, his brilliant strike was neutralised by Lasse Vibe's late goal and the spoils were shared, but the euphoria in this beautiful country did not disappear.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "neutralised by", ensure that the agent doing the neutralizing is clearly identified to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of saying "The acid was neutralised", specify "The acid was neutralised by the base".

Common error

Avoid assuming complete elimination when using "neutralised by". The phrase indicates a counteraction or reduction of effect, not necessarily a total removal. For example, saying "The threat was neutralised by diplomacy" doesn't guarantee the threat is entirely gone, just that its impact has been significantly reduced.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "neutralised by" functions as a passive construction indicating that an action or force has been countered or made ineffective. As Ludwig AI confirms, this usage is grammatically sound and widely applicable, supported by numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

32%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "neutralised by" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to indicate that something has been counteracted or made ineffective by another force or action. As Ludwig AI confirms, this passive construction is widely applicable across various contexts. It is frequently found in scientific and news-related sources, reflecting its utility in describing objective processes and events. To enhance clarity, always specify the agent of neutralization. While the phrase suggests a counteraction, it doesn't necessarily imply complete elimination. Related phrases include "counteracted by" and "offset by", offering subtle variations in meaning. When used correctly, "neutralised by" effectively conveys the dynamic interplay of opposing forces.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

counteracted by

This alternative emphasizes the action of opposing something to reduce its effect.

offset by

This option suggests that the effects are balanced out by something else.

rendered ineffective by

This directly states that something has been made unable to produce the desired result.

cancelled out by

This suggests that two opposing forces have balanced each other, resulting in no net effect.

invalidated by

This implies that something has been rendered without legal or factual basis due to another factor.

negated by

This suggests that something has been made ineffective or nonexistent by another action.

undone by

This means that the effects of something have been reversed or canceled out.

nullified by

Similar to invalidated, this indicates that something has been made void or without effect.

mitigated by

This implies that the negative effects of something have been lessened by another factor.

suppressed by

This suggests that something has been prevented from manifesting or being expressed.

FAQs

How can I use "neutralised by" in a sentence?

Use "neutralised by" to indicate that something has been counteracted or made ineffective by another force or action. For instance, "The poison was "neutralised by" the antidote".

What are some alternatives to "neutralised by"?

You can use alternatives such as "counteracted by", "offset by", or "invalidated by" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "neutralised by" in formal writing?

Yes, "neutralised by" is appropriate for formal writing. It is commonly used in academic, scientific, and professional contexts to describe the counteraction or reduction of an effect.

What's the difference between "neutralised by" and "mitigated by"?

"Neutralised by" suggests that something has been rendered ineffective, whereas "mitigated by" implies that the negative effects have been lessened or reduced but not necessarily eliminated.