negligible correlations

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "negligible correlations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to describe relationships or associations that are so small or insignificant that they can be ignored. Example: "The study found negligible correlations between the two variables, suggesting that they do not significantly influence each other."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

We can also see that some sectors, such as the financial or technological sector, change from negligible (positive) correlations at the beginning of the observational period to positive (negligible) correlations by the end of the period.

EPJ Data Science

All other model parameters ranked thereafter showed negligible correlations of r<0.1.

BMC Veterinary Research

In practice, mutational robustness has negligible correlations on the time scale of our successively saved genotypes, and thus the jackknife estimates are very similar to those obtained when ignoring correlations.

BMC Systems Biology

However, in this study negligible correlations were observed between Pst resistance (IT and SEV BLUE values across all six environments) and both heading time (R < 0.005) and plant height (R < 0.05).

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Three pairs of media resulted in highly correlated alignment, while the seven others present lower, or negligible correlation.

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Moreover, under accurate synchronization, pseudorandom sequences have been reported [13] to produce negligible correlation between the estimation errors of the different elements of the matrix.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

This is in contrast to the negligible correlation observed in the chemostat experiment.

Plosone

As shown in Figure 8A, the degradation rate constants show negligible correlation with the sharpness of the temporal profile of the non-degradable substrate; while the phosphorylation and dephosphorylation parameters show significant correlations.

Plosone

The negligible correlation means that there is no relationship between the two variables.

BMJ Open

Spearman's correlation coefficient between the t-statistic and the traveling ratios was −0.05, also suggesting negligible correlation.

Cell

Correlation coefficients were interpreted as negligible correlation (0 0.3); low correlation (0.3 0.5); moderate correlation (0.5 0.7); high correlation (0.7 0.9); or very high correlation (0.9 1.0) [ 16].

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting statistical results, use "negligible correlations" to clearly indicate that the relationship between variables is too weak to be meaningful or relevant. Provide the correlation coefficient (r) to support your claim.

Common error

Avoid assuming that a statistically significant correlation is automatically meaningful. Even if a correlation is statistically significant, it might still be "negligible" in practical terms. Always consider the effect size (r value) alongside the p-value.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "negligible correlations" serves as a descriptive term in statistical analysis, used to indicate that the relationships between variables are so weak they are not practically significant. Ludwig AI confirms this usage.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "negligible correlations" is a statistically relevant term predominantly used in the scientific domain. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English, commonly employed to describe relationships between variables that are too weak to be considered meaningful. When interpreting research findings, particularly in technical fields, noting "negligible correlations" indicates the absence of any practical link between examined factors, thereby steering analytical attention towards more significant associations. Remember to provide the correlation coefficient to reinforce your claim.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

insignificant correlations

Replaces "negligible" with a synonym that emphasizes the lack of importance.

minimal correlations

Uses "minimal" to suggest the correlations are very small and barely present.

weak correlations

Focuses on the strength of the correlation being low.

low correlations

Similar to "weak", but more direct in stating the correlation's magnitude.

near-zero correlations

Emphasizes that the correlation values are close to zero.

virtually no correlations

Highlights the near absence of any correlation.

statistically insignificant correlations

Adds the statistical context, suggesting the correlations are not meaningful in statistical analysis.

non-existent correlations

Strongly indicates that there is no relationship between the variables.

lack of correlation

Shifts from describing the correlations to stating their absence.

no discernible correlations

Suggests that the correlations are so weak they cannot be easily noticed or measured.

FAQs

How is "negligible correlations" typically used in scientific writing?

In scientific writing, "negligible correlations" indicates that the relationship between two or more variables is so weak that it's considered practically unimportant. It's often used to dismiss a potential association that might otherwise be considered.

What numerical range defines "negligible correlations"?

Generally, a correlation coefficient (r) between 0 and 0.3 (positive or negative) is considered a "negligible correlation". However, this can vary depending on the field of study.

What are some alternatives to "negligible correlations"?

You can use alternatives like "insignificant correlations", "minimal correlations", or "weak correlations" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it appropriate to use "negligible correlations" even if a p-value is significant?

Yes. A significant p-value only indicates that the correlation is unlikely to be due to chance. It doesn't tell you about the strength of the correlation. The correlation can be statistically significant but still "negligible correlations" in practical terms.