Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
negligent with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "negligent with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a lack of care or attention in relation to something or someone. Example: "The company was found to be negligent with its safety protocols, leading to several accidents."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
23 human-written examples
With increase in wood percentage, the clinker formation reduced and almost became negligent with wood percentage reaching to 30%.
Science
American life is like the American diet — equal parts hopeful and negligent, with something sweet and bubbly on the side.
News & Media
American life is like the American diet equal parts hopeful and negligent, with something sweet and bubbly on the side.
News & Media
"I was never negligent with Scarlett, I was naive in terms of the country we were visiting but I never didn't care about her".
News & Media
"And, clearly, with what's happening in the world right now, these foreign-policy makers have been irresponsible and negligent with our tax dollars".
News & Media
The court upheld a decision by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals that held that Ms. Davis was not a supervisor and that Ball State was not negligent with respect to her behavior.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
37 human-written examples
Mr. Ross, a Yale University student, was charged with misdemeanor negligent homicide with a motor vehicle and reckless driving.
News & Media
580 (1972); Roger B. Godwin, "Negligent Interference with Economic Expectancy: The Case for Recovery," 16 Stan.L.Rev.
Academia
1513 19855); Comment, "Negligent Interference with Contract: Knowledge As a Standard for Recovery," 63 Va.L.Rev.
Academia
The Shipping Controller, 1 K.B. 127 (1922), in which recovery was refused for negligent interference with contractual rights.
Academia
It is obvious that it is the majority of this Court which now "nods" in its equation of "negligent omission" with "breach of duty".
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "negligent with" when you want to emphasize a failure to exercise the appropriate level of care or responsibility regarding something specific. This phrase is suitable in both formal and informal contexts, depending on the severity of the negligence and the tone of the writing.
Common error
Avoid using "negligent with" when "negligent in" is more appropriate. "Negligent with" typically refers to how someone handles something, while "negligent in" indicates a failure to fulfill a duty or responsibility. For instance, use "negligent in their duties" rather than "negligent with their duties".
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "negligent with" functions as an adjective phrase followed by a preposition, modifying a noun or pronoun to describe a lack of due care or responsibility. Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
56%
Science
20%
Wiki
8%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
4%
Academia
4%
Formal & Business
4%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "negligent with" is a grammatically sound and commonly used way to describe a lack of care or responsibility in handling something. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. It appears most frequently in News & Media, Science, and Wiki sources, indicating its broad applicability. When using the phrase, ensure it accurately reflects a failure to exercise due care, and consider alternatives like "careless with" or "irresponsible with" for nuanced meaning. Avoid confusing it with "negligent in", which has a slightly different implication related to duty.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
careless with
Replaces "negligent" with a synonym indicating a lack of attention or caution.
irresponsible with
Substitutes "negligent" with a term emphasizing a failure to meet obligations or duties.
neglectful of
Emphasizes a consistent failure to care for or attend to something.
lax with
Replaces "negligent" with a word suggesting a relaxed or lenient approach, possibly to a fault.
remiss in
Shifts the structure, indicating a failure to fulfill a duty or responsibility related to something.
derelict in
Suggests a more serious abandonment of duty or obligation.
slack about
Indicates a casual or careless attitude regarding something.
inattentive to
Highlights a lack of attentiveness or focus concerning something.
forgetful about
Focuses on a tendency to forget or overlook important aspects of something.
slipshod with
Indicates carelessness and a lack of attention to detail in handling something.
FAQs
How is "negligent with" used in a sentence?
The phrase "negligent with" is used to describe someone who is not careful or responsible in how they handle something. For example, "The company was "negligent with" its safety protocols, leading to several accidents."
What can I say instead of "negligent with"?
You can use alternatives like "careless with", "irresponsible with", or "neglectful of" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "negligent with" or "negligent of"?
Both phrases are correct but have slightly different meanings. "Negligent with" describes carelessness in handling something, while "negligent of" describes a failure to fulfill a duty or responsibility. Choose the phrase that best fits the specific context.
What's the difference between "negligent with" and "careless with"?
While both imply a lack of proper care, ""negligent with"" often suggests a more serious failure or breach of duty than "careless with". Negligence can have legal implications, while carelessness is generally less severe.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested