negative results

USAGE SUMMARY

"negative results" can be used in written English.
For example, "The study concluded with negative results indicating there was no significant correlation between the two variables."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

All three had negative results.

The New York Times

Positive results get reported, negative results ignored.

The Guardian

"People do not report negative results".

The New York Times - Science

"This is likely to have negative results".

The New York Times

Negative results do not make headlines.

The Guardian

Icatibant showed negative results.

European Journal of Pharmacology

That's the thing about negative results – you can't publish them.

The Guardian

"Negative results are also important to share," Dr. Varan said.

The New York Times - Tech

They found large negative results in both reading and math.

The New York Times

ALS ASSOCIATION-Talampanel Trial Concluded with Negative Results.

Nature

Preprints could become an effective outlet for negative results.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always provide context when reporting "negative results". Explain the methodology and potential reasons for the outcome. This adds credibility and prevents misinterpretation.

Common error

Avoid framing "negative results" solely as failures. Instead, highlight what was learned and how it informs future research or actions. Emphasize that these results are valuable in refining hypotheses and approaches.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "negative results" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes outcomes or findings that are unfavorable or do not confirm a hypothesis. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is used correctly in the provided examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "negative results" is a commonly used phrase that describes outcomes which are not positive or do not support a hypothesis. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in various contexts, spanning science, news, and academia. While often perceived negatively, these results are crucial for scientific progress, helping to refine hypotheses and avoid unproductive avenues. Reporting "negative results" promotes transparency and prevents publication bias, contributing to a more complete understanding of the subject. Remember to contextualize "negative results" and focus on the insights gained, rather than framing them as failures.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

adverse outcomes

Focuses on the consequence being unfavorable or detrimental.

unfavorable findings

Emphasizes that the findings or data are not positive or supportive.

poor outcomes

Highlights the inadequacy or deficiency of the results.

failed experiments

Specifically relates to experiments that did not yield the desired or expected results.

unsuccessful outcomes

Indicates a lack of success in achieving a particular goal or result.

undesirable effects

Focuses on the unwanted or harmful effects produced.

disappointing results

Highlights the feeling of letdown associated with the outcome.

null results

Commonly used in scientific contexts to describe results showing no effect or relationship.

non-significant results

Indicates that the results are not statistically significant.

fruitless endeavors

Emphasizes the lack of productivity or positive outcomes from efforts made.

FAQs

How can I use "negative results" in a sentence?

You can use "negative results" to describe outcomes that are not positive or do not support a hypothesis, such as, "The clinical trial yielded "negative results", indicating the drug was not effective".

What are some alternatives to saying "negative results"?

Alternatives include "adverse outcomes", "unfavorable findings", or "poor outcomes", depending on the specific context.

Are "negative results" always bad?

Not necessarily. While they may not be the desired outcome, "negative results" provide valuable information that can help refine hypotheses, improve methodologies, and prevent repeating unsuccessful approaches. They contribute to the overall understanding of a subject.

In scientific research, why is it important to report "negative results"?

Reporting "negative results" prevents publication bias, ensures transparency, and allows other researchers to avoid pursuing unproductive avenues. It contributes to a more complete and accurate understanding of the subject under investigation.