negative outcome for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "negative outcome for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the consequences or results of a particular action or situation that are unfavorable or undesirable. Example: "The decision to cut funding could lead to a negative outcome for the community programs that rely on those resources."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

31 human-written examples

Management at both Triggertrap and Kickstarter recognised a negative outcome for their employees, and abandoned unlimited paid leave accordingly.

The Guardian - Opinion

It is clear that the most negative outcome for the opposition has been the unjust imprisonment of 75 brave men and women, many of whom are elderly or in poor health.

The New York Times

Though it was said at first that the results would not be disclosed, Mr Zuma told his audience that his sample, like three previous ones, had "registered a negative outcome for the HI virus".

The Economist

A negative outcome for teachers is that important formative assessment and feedback-on-learning opportunities get omitted, too.

International Journal of STEM Education

We find that waiting at an ED due to overcrowding tends to generate a negative outcome for all patients.

Health Economics Review

There was an incredible media glare this week on the Kleiner Perkins sex discrimination trial and its negative outcome for Ellen Pao, but all the news about equality in tech was not nearly as negative.

TechCrunch

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

29 human-written examples

Development interventions involve change, and change can result in profoundly negative outcomes for some or many.

The Guardian

The latter is about companies managing their business processes to produce positive outcomes, or at least not to produce negative outcomes for society.

The Guardian - Opinion

Government policies confer much of the negative outcomes for children of teenage parents.

The New York Times

In other studies, we see negative outcomes – for example, ebooks that tack on sound effects or games distract children from understanding the actual story they're reading.

The Guardian

Professor Leahy pointed to one study of students who predicted negative outcomes for various concerns, like an exam or a relationship.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "negative outcome for", ensure the context clearly establishes what is experiencing the negative outcome. Be specific to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

While "negative outcome for" is acceptable, overuse can make writing sound repetitive. Vary your language with synonyms like "adverse consequence for" or "detrimental effect on" to enhance readability.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "negative outcome for" functions as a prepositional phrase that indicates an undesirable result or consequence impacting a specific entity. Ludwig examples show its applicability across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

35%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "negative outcome for" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe an undesirable result or consequence affecting a specific entity. Ludwig AI confirms its usability and appropriateness across various contexts. While versatile, consider using synonyms in formal writing to avoid repetition. The phrase is frequently found in scientific and news media sources, indicating its relevance in analyzing risks and communicating potential adverse effects. Ensure clear context to avoid ambiguity and choose alternatives like "adverse consequence for" or "detrimental effect on" depending on the desired tone and emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

adverse consequence for

Replaces "outcome" with "consequence" and "negative" with "adverse", emphasizing the detrimental nature of the result.

detrimental effect on

Shifts the focus to the "effect" or impact, using "detrimental" to highlight harm or damage.

unfavorable result for

Substitutes "outcome" with "result" and "negative" with "unfavorable", presenting a less positive or advantageous consequence.

poor prognosis for

Specifically used in contexts related to health or predictions, indicating a less optimistic outlook.

damaging impact on

Emphasizes the harm caused by the effect, using "damaging" to denote significant negative influence.

ill effect on

A more concise way of saying negative effect, using "ill" to indicate harm.

negative repercussions for

Replaces outcome with repercussions, and it highlights the negative consequences or aftereffects of an action or event.

downside for

Offers a simpler, more informal way to express a disadvantageous aspect or result.

drawback for

Similar to "downside", emphasizing a limitation or disadvantage.

setback for

Indicates a reversal or impediment to progress, representing a negative turn of events.

FAQs

How can I use "negative outcome for" in a sentence?

Use "negative outcome for" to describe an undesirable result or consequence affecting someone or something. For example: "The budget cuts had a "negative outcome for" local schools."

What's a more formal alternative to "negative outcome for"?

In formal writing, consider using alternatives like "adverse consequence for" or "detrimental effect on" to maintain a professional tone.

Is "negative outcome for" always the best choice, or are there situations where other phrases are more suitable?

While "negative outcome for" is generally applicable, phrases like "poor prognosis for" may be more appropriate in medical contexts, or "damaging impact on" when emphasizing harm.

What is the difference between "negative outcome for" and "negative impact on"?

"Negative outcome for" refers to the result or consequence experienced by someone or something, while "negative impact on" emphasizes the effect or influence. The former focuses on the result, and the latter on the effect.