needs to review

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "needs to review" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that someone is required to examine or assess something, often in a professional or academic context. Example: "The report is incomplete and needs to review the latest data before submission."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

50 human-written examples

The government needs to review its short-sighted policy urgently.

The Guardian - Books

If God exists, he needs to review his plan".

The New York Times

"The government needs to review its plans to slash so much of the teaching budget.

The Guardian

Instead, they add, Russia needs to review manufacturing, create new industries and attract foreign capital.

The New York Times

Before spending money in future to maintain the stockpile, the department needs to review what level of coverage is appropriate.

The Guardian - Business

This latest episode shows that the Army needs to review how it responds to all harassment complaints, whether formal or informal.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

8 human-written examples

We need to review all the missions.

The New York Times

"They need to review their methodology," Mr. Nickles said.

The New York Times

"We'll need to review the document closely.

The New York Times

I need to review the laws of reunion concerts.

The New York Times - Arts

Sometimes, even coaches need to review their subject matter.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "needs to review", ensure the context clearly indicates what requires examination. Providing specific details enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

While "needs to review" is acceptable, overuse in formal contexts can make writing sound repetitive. Vary your language by using alternatives like "must evaluate" or "should assess" to maintain a professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "needs to review" functions as a modal verb phrase indicating a necessity or obligation to examine or reassess something. This is supported by Ludwig, which confirms the phrase's correctness and usability, showing it's used to express required action.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "needs to review" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression indicating the necessity of examining or reassessing something. Ludwig confirms this assessment and provides numerous examples across various contexts. While its register is generally neutral, alternatives might be preferable in highly formal settings. It is most frequently encountered in News & Media sources, with Science and Formal & Business contexts also being common. Therefore, ensure clarity and precision when using "needs to review", specifying what requires examination to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

should re-examine

Replaces "needs to" with "should", suggesting a recommendation rather than an obligation, and "review" with "re-examine", emphasizing a more thorough inspection.

ought to reassess

Substitutes "needs to" with "ought to", indicating a moral obligation, and "review" with "reassess", highlighting the need to evaluate again.

must re-evaluate

Replaces "needs to" with "must", indicating a stronger obligation, and "review" with "re-evaluate", stressing the need to judge the value of something again.

has to reconsider

Substitutes "needs to review" with "has to reconsider", focusing on the necessity of thinking about something again.

is required to audit

Replaces "needs to review" with "is required to audit", suggesting a formal and systematic examination.

is advised to inspect

Replaces "needs to review" with "is advised to inspect", indicating a recommendation for a careful and detailed examination.

should take another look at

Offers a more informal alternative, suggesting a casual yet necessary re-examination.

would benefit from a review

Changes the phrasing to emphasize the positive outcome of the review process.

it is imperative to revise

Substitutes the original phrase with a formal construction stressing urgency and importance using "revise".

it's important to check

Offers a simplified, more direct alternative emphasizing the significance of verifying something.

FAQs

How can I use "needs to review" in a sentence?

You can use "needs to review" to indicate that someone or something should examine or assess something. For example, "The government "needs to review" its policy" or "The expert "needs to review" the data".

What are some alternatives to "needs to review"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "should re-examine", "ought to reassess", or "must re-evaluate".

Is there a difference between "needs to review" and "has to review"?

"Needs to review" and "has to review" are quite similar, but "has to review" often implies a stronger sense of obligation or external requirement compared to ""needs to review"".

When is it appropriate to use "needs to review" in writing?

It is appropriate to use "needs to review" in both formal and informal writing when you want to convey the necessity of examining or reassessing something. However, in very formal contexts, consider using more sophisticated alternatives like "is required to audit" or "it is imperative to revise".