needs to join

USAGE SUMMARY

"needs to join" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the need for someone or something to become part of a larger group. For example, "The new employee needs to join the team as soon as possible."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

47 human-written examples

Mr. Obama needs to join her.

The New York Times

And then Congress needs to join them.

The Washington Post

"China really needs to join the world," she said.

The New York Times

CEHR needs to join the club of modern, effective, 20th-century regulators.

The Guardian - Opinion

"News and sports are really clicking; entertainment needs to join them".

The New York Times - Sports

"@zaynmalik needs to join jihad," @ISILCats tweeted last June, "not be another dumb sissy celebrity".

The Guardian - Music

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

13 human-written examples

The revolutionaries need to join together".

The New York Times

You need to join a union.

Independent

"You need to join us".

The New York Times

We need to join them.

The Guardian - Opinion

"We need to join forces.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "needs to join" when expressing that someone or something is required to become a part of a group or effort. It clearly conveys a necessity for inclusion.

Common error

Avoid using "needs to join" in very informal conversations where simpler alternatives like "should join" or "can join" might sound more natural.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "needs to join" functions as a modal verb phrase indicating a necessity or requirement. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and suggests that someone or something is required to become part of a group.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

57%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

12%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Reference

2%

Academia

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "needs to join" is a versatile expression indicating a necessity for inclusion or participation. According to Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and commonly used. Analysis of various sources, including news outlets and scientific publications, confirms its prevalence across different contexts, maintaining a neutral register. While alternatives exist, such as "should participate in" or "must be included in", "needs to join" effectively conveys the requirement for something or someone to become part of a group, effort, or system. Ludwig's examples highlight its widespread usage and applicability in diverse situations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

should participate in

Suggests a recommendation rather than a strict requirement, implying less urgency.

must be included in

Highlights the necessity of inclusion, often due to specific rules or conditions.

is required to integrate with

Emphasizes a mandatory aspect of joining, often in a formal or technical context.

ought to become a member of

Implies a moral obligation or a sense of duty to become part of a group.

has to merge with

Indicates a fusion or unification process, where joining is essential for survival or growth.

is encouraged to participate in

Suggests that participation is desired and welcomed, but not strictly necessary.

is expected to associate with

Implies a social or professional expectation for someone to connect with a group.

would benefit from collaborating with

Focuses on the advantages that would arise from joining, rather than the necessity.

is advised to connect with

Suggests a recommendation based on potential benefits, often in a professional context.

should link up with

Offers a more informal suggestion for someone to connect or join a group.

FAQs

How can I use "needs to join" in a sentence?

You can use "needs to join" to express a requirement or necessity for someone or something to become part of a group or effort. For example, "The new software "needs to join" the network to function properly."

What are some alternatives to "needs to join"?

Alternatives include "should participate in", "ought to become a member of", or "is required to integrate with", depending on the context and the level of formality you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "needs to join" instead of "should join"?

"Needs to join" implies a stronger necessity than "should join". Use "needs to join" when there is a critical requirement for inclusion, whereas "should join" suggests a recommendation or benefit from joining.

Is "needs to join" formal or informal?

"Needs to join" is generally neutral and can be used in both formal and informal contexts. However, in very casual settings, simpler phrases like "has to join" might be more appropriate.