needs to be tested

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of the sentence "needs to be tested" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to express the need for something to be tested or checked for accuracy or quality. For example: "The new software needs to be tested for bugs before it can be released to the public."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Miliband says that needs to be tested.

The Guardian

This needs to be tested though".

The Guardian

"We believe that the sanctions regime needs to be tested".

The Guardian

However, even this, my favorite hypothesis, needs to be tested.

The New York Times - Health

First, though, it needs to be tested in humans.

MIT Technology Review

I think the new Iranian government needs to be tested.

Princeton University

But that argument clearly needs to be tested.

The Economist

This analysis, although intriguing, needs to be tested further.

The Economist

This is a proposition that now needs to be tested.

The New York Times

He has to come out of that life and he needs to be tested".

The Guardian

However implausible such a claim may be it needs to be tested.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "needs to be tested", ensure the context clearly identifies what is being tested and the purpose of the testing. This provides clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "needs to be tested" without specifying the criteria or parameters for the test. Unclear scope can lead to ineffective testing and unreliable results.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "needs to be tested" functions as a modal expression indicating a necessity or requirement for validation or verification. It suggests that something is not yet proven and requires further examination to ensure accuracy or effectiveness. Ludwig AI confirms the correctness and usability of the phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

49%

Academia

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "needs to be tested" is a common and grammatically correct expression used to indicate the necessity of verification or validation. As evidenced by Ludwig's examples, it appears frequently in scientific, news, and academic contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage, highlighting its role in emphasizing the importance of empirical evidence. When using this phrase, it is best practice to clearly specify what is being tested and the criteria for the test to avoid ambiguity. Alternative phrases include "requires verification" or "demands validation", depending on the specific nuance desired.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

needs to be validated empirically

Points out that the need of empirical validation.

requires verification

Emphasizes the need for proof or confirmation of something.

requires additional experimentation

Emphasizes the need for more experiments.

demands validation

Highlights the importance of establishing the soundness or correctness of something.

should be validated

Recommends validating something to ensure its accuracy.

warrants further investigation

Suggests that more detailed inquiry or examination is necessary.

must undergo scrutiny

Indicates the necessity of careful and critical examination.

is subject to examination

States that something will be formally inspected or assessed.

calls for assessment

Implies that an evaluation or appraisal is required.

begs for experimentation

Suggests the necessity of experimental verification.

FAQs

How can I use "needs to be tested" in a sentence?

You can use "needs to be tested" to indicate that something requires verification or validation. For example, "This hypothesis "needs to be tested" experimentally".

What are some alternatives to saying "needs to be tested"?

Alternatives include "requires verification", "demands validation", or "warrants further investigation". The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "needs to be tested" and "should be tested"?

"Needs to be tested" implies a greater necessity or urgency compared to "should be tested". The latter suggests a recommendation rather than a requirement.

In what contexts is "needs to be tested" most appropriate?

It is suitable in contexts where verification is crucial, such as scientific research, software development, or policy evaluation. Basically scenarios where there is the need to assess "warrants further investigation".