Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
needs of comparison
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "needs of comparison" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to express the requirements or criteria for making a comparison, but it is not a commonly used expression. Example: "In evaluating the two products, we must consider the needs of comparison to ensure a fair assessment."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
The BLAST [ 12] search engine described earlier in the Tools menu is also available to meet specific needs of comparison and alignments.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
Three of them involved various proportions of mud (MOPCC 10%, MOPCC 20% and MOPCC 30%), and the fourth one is control concrete (CC 00%) for the need of comparison.
Moreover, Gemini programs can also perform on a single protein oligomer without the need of comparison partners.
Science
Standardization and quality control of CTC technologies and the need of comparison studies between different methodologies for CTC isolation and detection were intensely discussed.
Science
Considering the need of comparison with other study [ 26], we used the definition of undercorrected refractive error as an improvement of two or more lines in visual acuity in the better eye after refraction of the same eye.
Science
One such demonstration of needs of interlaboratory comparison data is given in the inorganic arsenic case study (Hughes 2006).
The former two can take advantage of muscle memory (size, in particular) while the latter two often need points of comparison to be truly appreciated.
News & Media
This needs further investigation of comparison between participants who stayed-in to those who dropped out from the survey.
To avoid the need of indirect comparison, manufacturers could encourage with the HTA agencies to set up study designs for Phase III trials that allow direct comparisons.
Science
Since, if (nu le 3), (L^2_{loc}) is the same as locally Stummel, this implies Jörgen's conjecture for (Omega = emptyset ) and these (nu ) (indeed without the need of a comparison potential!).
The relative efficiencies of mutator and non-mutator pathways are considered, thus circumventing the need for comparisons of absolute rates of tumorigenesis with epidemiologic data, with their inherent limitations such as the assumption that every malignant cell becomes a clinical cancer.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When discussing the "needs of comparison", consider using more precise phrases like "comparison criteria" or "requirements for comparison" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness.
Common error
Avoid using the phrase "needs of comparison" as it is not standard English. Instead, opt for clearer alternatives such as "comparison requirements" or "criteria for comparison" to maintain grammatical accuracy.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "needs of comparison" functions as a noun phrase, though it is grammatically unconventional. It attempts to describe the necessary elements or requirements for conducting a comparison. Ludwig AI indicates this phrasing is not correct in standard written English.
Frequent in
Science
79%
News & Media
12%
Formal & Business
9%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "needs of comparison" is grammatically incorrect and infrequently used in standard English. Ludwig AI confirms its non-standard nature, advising against its use. While the intention is to express the necessary elements for making a comparison, it's better to opt for clearer and more precise alternatives like "comparison criteria" or "requirements for comparison". The context of use is primarily scientific, though its presence in other domains is noted. To ensure clarity and accuracy in writing, avoid this phrasing and choose more conventional alternatives.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
comparison requirements
Focuses directly on the necessary conditions or standards for a valid comparison.
comparison criteria
Highlights the specific benchmarks or measures used to evaluate and compare items or subjects.
requirements for comparison
Emphasizes the prerequisites that must be met to enable a meaningful comparison.
criteria for conducting comparisons
Specifies the detailed standards applied when performing comparative analyses.
benchmarks for comparison
Stresses the use of specific, measurable standards against which comparisons are made.
comparison considerations
Highlights the aspects and factors to bear in mind in order to make a good comparison.
essential points of comparison
Focuses on the most important aspects that should be considered when comparing different things.
points of reference for comparison
Highlights how comparisons always need a reference to assess similarities and differences.
comparison metrics
Refers to the quantitative measures used to compare different items or datasets.
basis for comparison
Emphasizes the fundamental elements or rationale upon which a comparison is founded.
FAQs
What are some alternative ways to express the requirements for making a comparison?
Instead of using "needs of comparison", consider using alternatives such as "comparison criteria", "requirements for comparison", or "benchmarks for comparison".
Is "needs of comparison" grammatically correct?
No, "needs of comparison" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use phrases like "comparison requirements" or "criteria for comparison".
How can I ensure my comparison is clear and accurate?
To ensure clarity, define specific "comparison criteria" or "points of comparison" before making any assessments. This provides a structured approach.
What's the difference between "needs of comparison" and "criteria for comparison"?
"Needs of comparison" is not a standard English phrase. "Criteria for comparison" refers to the specific standards or benchmarks used to evaluate and compare different items or subjects.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested