needed to be restructured

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "needed to be restructured" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing something that requires changes or a different organization, such as a document, plan, or system. Example: "After reviewing the project, it was clear that the proposal needed to be restructured to better align with our goals."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

Mr. Nyman said the city government needed to be restructured to get away from bossism.

The New York Times

That is odd given BHS's pension scheme had a significant deficit and needed to be restructured.

The Guardian - Business

Asked if Greek debt needed to be restructured, he said: "Most certainly not.

The New York Times

Mr. Grassley said the internal agency battle showed that the agency needed to be restructured to give more power to safety officials like Dr. Graham and Dr. Gelperin over their counterparts who approve medicines and deal more directly with drug makers.

The New York Times - Health

His administration's submission to the Silk Commission, which is looking at the scope of the Welsh Assembly's remit, says devolution needed to be "restructured".

BBC

Talk of splitting the bank grew after his comments but, in the end, the Banking Standards Commission did not call firmly for the splitting up of the bank in its report in June, instead urging the Treasury to carry out a forensic analysis of whether RBS actually needed to be restructured, which the commission did not have the time to do.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

Pro cycling needs to be restructured.

The New York Times - Sports

Classrooms may also need to be restructured.

The Guardian - Tech

The health benefits plan needs to be restructured.

The New York Times

As vacancy rates climb and values drop, many of these loans will need to be restructured.

The New York Times

"The F.I.A. needs to be restructured and there needs to be more corporate governance," Stewart also said.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "needed to be restructured", ensure that the reason for the restructuring is clear within the context. Specify which aspects required changes for better understanding.

Common error

Avoid using "needed to be restructured" without specifying what exactly required changes. Provide context to ensure the reader understands the scope and purpose of the restructuring, otherwise the sentence may lack precision.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "needed to be restructured" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that something required changes to its fundamental structure or organization. It implies a necessity for transformation or reform, as suggested by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

62%

Science

24%

Wiki

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "needed to be restructured" is a common and grammatically correct passive verb phrase used to express the necessity of organizational or structural changes. Ludwig AI indicates that it is suitable for various contexts, with a neutral register that makes it appropriate for news media, business, and academic discussions. While the phrase is widely used, it's crucial to provide context, specifying what aspects required changes to ensure clear communication. Alternatives such as "required reorganization" or "had to be overhauled" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

required reorganization

Emphasizes the act of reorganizing as a necessity.

had to be overhauled

Suggests a more extensive and thorough restructuring.

demanded a redesign

Focuses on the need for a new design or plan.

required fundamental changes

Highlights the need for deep and significant alterations.

needed significant adjustments

Emphasizes the requirement for notable alterations.

had to undergo modifications

Focuses on the process of undergoing changes.

called for a transformation

Implies a more dramatic and complete change.

warranted a new approach

Highlights the need for a different method or strategy.

needed to be reformed

Suggests the need to improve through systematic changes.

required a different structure

Focuses specifically on the need for a new framework.

FAQs

How can I use "needed to be restructured" in a sentence?

Use "needed to be restructured" to indicate that something required significant changes to its organization or structure. For example, "The company's organizational chart "needed to be restructured" to improve efficiency".

What are some alternatives to "needed to be restructured"?

Alternatives include "required reorganization", "had to be overhauled", or "demanded a redesign" depending on the context.

Is it better to use the active or passive voice when describing restructuring needs?

While both active and passive voices are grammatically correct, the passive voice (e.g., "needed to be restructured") emphasizes the object of the action. Using the active voice (e.g., "required restructuring") can make the sentence more direct and concise.

What's the difference between "needed to be restructured" and "needed to be revised"?

"Needed to be restructured" implies a more fundamental change to the underlying structure or organization. "Needed to be revised", by contrast, suggests that only minor corrections or updates are required.