need to review

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "need to review" is grammatically correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express the need to look over something again, with the intention to make any necessary changes. For example, "We need to review the budget one more time before submitting it."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

"We'll need to review the document closely.

The New York Times

We need to review all the missions.

The New York Times

"They need to review their methodology," Mr. Nickles said.

The New York Times

Sometimes, even coaches need to review their subject matter.

The New York Times - Sports

I need to review the laws of reunion concerts.

The New York Times - Arts

Perhaps we need to review what terrorists can and cannot do.

The New York Times

"But first we need to review all aspects of our corporate governance".

The New York Times

"But you need to review the language each time," Mr. Ventres said.

The New York Times

I recognise that there is a need to review and improve our relationship with the media.

The Guardian

Universities need to review why they engage with the wider world before they lose their way.

The Guardian

So we need to review the sanctions schools, police, the courts, and the government, have available".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "need to review", ensure the context clearly states what requires review and why it's necessary. This adds clarity and purpose to your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "need to review" as a filler phrase. Always provide context or reason for the review to avoid ambiguity and ensure the statement is meaningful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "need to review" functions as a verb phrase expressing the necessity of examining or re-evaluating something. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

51%

Science

31%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "need to review" is a versatile expression signifying the necessity of re-examining or re-evaluating something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely used across various contexts, primarily in News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business settings. When using "need to review", it's important to provide clear context to ensure the statement is meaningful and not just a filler. Related phrases like "require a review" or "necessitate reassessment" can be used to add nuance, but the core message remains consistent: a re-evaluation is required.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

require a review

Emphasizes the necessity of a review, focusing on the requirement rather than the action.

necessitate reassessment

Highlights the importance of reassessing something, suggesting a formal evaluation.

call for revision

Suggests that changes are needed, implying the current version is inadequate.

warrant reconsideration

Indicates that something deserves to be thought about again, possibly leading to a different conclusion.

demand further scrutiny

Focuses on the need for closer inspection and examination of something.

should be re-evaluated

Suggests that a formal process of evaluation needs to happen again.

must be re-examined

Highlights the imperative to examine something again, likely due to new information or concerns.

begs the question of a review

Indicates that the current situation naturally leads to the need for a review.

entail a second look

Implies that something needs to be looked at again, perhaps from a different perspective.

compel re-analysis

Stresses the urgent need for re-analyzing something, indicating potential issues.

FAQs

How can I use "need to review" in a sentence?

You can use "need to review" to indicate a requirement for re-examining something, such as "We "need to review" the budget before the meeting".

What are some alternatives to "need to review"?

Alternatives include "require a review", "necessitate reassessment", or "call for revision", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "need to review" or "needs to be reviewed"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "need to review" is more direct and active, while "needs to be reviewed" is passive. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the action or the object being reviewed.

When is it appropriate to use "need to review" in professional writing?

It's appropriate when you want to express the necessity of re-examining documents, strategies, or data. For example, "We "need to review" the marketing plan to align with the new company goals".