Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
narrower in scope
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "narrower in scope" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the limitations or specific focus of a topic, project, or argument compared to a broader context. Example: "The new policy is narrower in scope than the previous one, addressing only specific issues rather than the entire range of concerns."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
44 human-written examples
Accordingly they have also been narrower in scope.
News & Media
They would like a bill narrower in scope, one that would restrict lawsuits.
News & Media
Although narrower in scope, ecotoxicology played an important role in the development of environmental toxicology.
Encyclopedias
The patent is widely known as the "pinch to zoom" patent, but the software is actually narrower in scope.
News & Media
It is narrower in scope than its predecessor, which followed a multicultural cohort of actors, dancers and singers through sexual identity crises and professional growing pains.
News & Media
Past investigations of Henry Blodget and Jack B. Grubman, research analysts at Merrill Lynch and Salomon Smith Barney, were narrower in scope.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
16 human-written examples
It was spunky, if narrow in scope.
News & Media
Embargoes may be broad or narrow in scope.
Encyclopedias
C. K. Williams's poems are broad in scale and narrow in scope.
News & Media
They said they feared that Tuesday's drill would be too narrow in scope.
News & Media
They are too early, too careful, each too narrow in scope for that.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "narrower in scope", ensure that you clearly define what the broader scope is for comparison. This provides context and clarifies the limitation.
Common error
Avoid using "narrower in scope" without specifying what the original or broader scope encompasses. Without this context, the phrase lacks meaning and can confuse the reader.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "narrower in scope" functions as a comparative adjective phrase, typically modifying a noun or concept. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability, denoting a limitation or restriction in breadth or extent.
Frequent in
News & Media
40%
Academia
30%
Science
20%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
5%
Wiki
3%
Formal & Business
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "narrower in scope" is a grammatically sound and commonly used comparative phrase that indicates a limitation or restriction in the breadth of a subject or project. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and offers helpful contextual examples. It's most frequently found in news, academic, and scientific sources, suggesting a professional and neutral register. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly define what the original or broader scope is to provide adequate context. While there are semantically similar alternatives available, choosing "narrower in scope" often provides the most direct and readily understood comparison.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
more limited in extent
Focuses on the limitation of the extent rather than the breadth of application.
more restricted in range
Emphasizes the limitation of the range or variety.
more limited in application
Highlights the specific application area being limited.
more focused in coverage
Indicates a sharper, more concentrated focus.
more specific in detail
Highlights a greater level of specificity, reducing generality.
more concise in outline
Indicates a reduction in the length or complexity of the outline.
more precise in definition
Focuses on accuracy and exactness in defining something.
more targeted in approach
Highlights a specific, deliberate targeting strategy.
more refined in selection
Suggests a careful and improved selection process.
more circumscribed in area
Emphasizes the boundaries or limits of the area under consideration.
FAQs
How can I effectively use "narrower in scope" in a sentence?
To effectively use "narrower in scope", clearly contrast it with a broader or previous context. For example, "The new regulation is "narrower in scope" than the previous one, focusing only on specific industries."
What are some alternatives to "narrower in scope" that I can use in my writing?
Alternatives to "narrower in scope" include "more limited in extent", "more restricted in range", or "more focused in coverage". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it grammatically correct to say "more narrow in scope" instead of "narrower in scope"?
While "more narrow in scope" isn't incorrect, "narrower in scope" is generally preferred for being more concise and grammatically standard when making a direct comparison.
In what situations is it appropriate to use the phrase "narrower in scope"?
The phrase "narrower in scope" is appropriate when discussing a topic, project, or argument that has a more limited focus or extent compared to something broader or previous. This often happens in legal, academic, or policy contexts.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested