Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

narrow in scope

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "narrow in scope" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that has a limited range or focus, often in discussions about projects, research, or policies. Example: "The study was narrow in scope, focusing only on urban areas and excluding rural populations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was spunky, if narrow in scope.

Embargoes may be broad or narrow in scope.

C. K. Williams's poems are broad in scale and narrow in scope.

News & Media

The New York Times

They said they feared that Tuesday's drill would be too narrow in scope.

News & Media

The New York Times

They are too early, too careful, each too narrow in scope for that.

News & Media

The Guardian

"This well-intentioned amendment is too narrow in scope," he said.

News & Media

The New York Times

It is a power that, before this government came into office, had been relatively narrow in scope and little-used.

Yet it is too narrow in scope to do justice to the medieval world it wants to resurrect.

In Spain, by contrast, Mr. Zapatero had to defend the Constitution against claims that it is too narrow in scope.

News & Media

The New York Times

The historical narrative of digital architecture that has developed in the past two decades has been narrow in scope.

Most papers and reviews on this topic have been narrow in scope and have not examined multiple spatial scales.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing research or analysis, use "narrow in scope" to clearly indicate that the investigation is intentionally focused on a specific aspect or area, rather than a broad overview.

Common error

Avoid using "narrow in scope" when you actually mean incomplete or insufficient. Make sure the limited scope is a deliberate choice, not an oversight. If scope needs extension use instead phrases like "widen the scope".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "narrow in scope" functions as an adjectival phrase. It typically modifies a noun, describing the extent or range of something, such as a project, study, or policy. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

51%

Science

26%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

6%

Wiki

1%

Formal & Business

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "narrow in scope" is a grammatically sound and frequently used adjectival phrase to describe something with a restricted range or focus. It is appropriate for various contexts, including news, science, and academic discussions. According to Ludwig AI, it's perfectly valid in written English. When using this phrase, ensure that the limited scope is intentional and clearly defined. Alternatives like ""limited in scope"" or "restricted in coverage" can be used depending on the specific context. Remember to avoid overgeneralization and to use the phrase when the limited focus is a deliberate choice.

FAQs

How can I use "narrow in scope" in a sentence?

You can use "narrow in scope" to describe something with a limited range or focus. For example, "The research was "limited in scope", concentrating only on short-term effects."

What's the difference between "narrow in scope" and ""limited in scope""?

While both phrases are similar, "narrow in scope" often implies an intentional restriction for specific purposes, whereas ""limited in scope"" can also suggest a constraint due to resources or other factors. They are often interchangeable.

What are some alternatives to "narrow in scope"?

Alternatives include "restricted in scope", "limited in extent", or "specialized in focus", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "too narrow in scope"?

Yes, it's grammatically correct. The adverb "too" simply intensifies the adjective phrase, indicating that the scope is excessively restricted. An example is "The investigation was "too limited" to draw meaningful conclusions".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: