limited in scope

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "limited in scope" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a particular topic or issue that has a narrow focus, restricted range, or has a specific set of boundaries. For example: "The study of ancient Greek literature is quite limited in scope compared to other areas of study."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"The theory," says Cranmer, "is limited in scope".

The New Yorker

(Previous visits have been brief and highly limited in scope).

The New Yorker

Unfortunately, the report is limited in scope to the USA.

The Guardian

Each role is clearly defined and limited in scope.

Harvard Business Review

Its problems are demanding, but limited in scope.

Harvard Business Review

They're both early and very limited in scope.

The Guardian - Tech

Airbnb's new agreement with DFEH is limited in scope.

The Guardian - Tech

Hardeman's trial has been more limited in scope.

The Guardian - Business

"But let's say it did: it was limited in scope".

The New York Times

Apple described the agreement as limited in scope.

The New York Times - Tech

Consequently, the application is quite limited in scope.

Progress in Polymer Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "limited in scope", clearly define what the limitations are. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity. For example, instead of saying "The research is limited in scope", specify "The research is limited in scope to patients aged 65 and older".

Common error

Avoid using "limited in scope" as a vague disclaimer. Instead, be specific about the aspects that are restricted or not fully addressed. This enhances the credibility and transparency of your communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "limited in scope" functions as an adjective phrase, modifying a noun to indicate that something is restricted or constrained in its extent, range, or application. As Ludwig AI states, it is usable and correct in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

18%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "limited in scope" is a versatile and grammatically sound expression used to denote restrictions or boundaries in various contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a correct and usable phrase in written English. Its frequency is very common, appearing predominantly in news, scientific, and formal business settings. When using this phrase, being specific about the limitations enhances clarity and credibility. Consider alternatives like "restricted in application" or "narrow in extent" for nuanced communication. Avoiding overgeneralization ensures that the limitations are clearly understood.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

restricted in application

Focuses on the constrained applicability of something.

narrow in extent

Emphasizes the reduced breadth or reach of something.

circumscribed in range

Highlights the defined boundaries or limits of something.

finite in application

Implies a clear and definite limit to how something can be used.

constrained in breadth

Stresses the lack of extensive coverage or inclusivity.

small-scale

Indicates a reduced or minimal size or magnitude.

localized in effect

Suggests that the impact is confined to a specific area or group.

particular in focus

Emphasizes a specific and selective concentration on certain aspects.

specified in coverage

Highlights the defined and detailed nature of the coverage.

contained in parameters

Indicates that something operates within defined boundaries or limits.

FAQs

How can I use "limited in scope" in a sentence?

You can use "limited in scope" to describe something that has a restricted range or focus. For example: "The study was "limited in scope", focusing only on urban areas."

What are some alternatives to saying "limited in scope"?

Alternatives include "restricted in application", "narrow in extent", or "circumscribed in range". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to be specific about limitations rather than just saying "limited in scope"?

Yes, providing specific details about the limitations makes your statement more informative and credible. For example, instead of saying "The analysis is "limited in scope"", specify what aspects are not covered or fully addressed.

What's the difference between "limited in scope" and "small scale"?

"Limited in scope" refers to the range or focus of something, while "small scale" refers to the size or magnitude. A project can be "limited in scope" but still involve a large-scale effort, or vice versa.