name at least

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "name at least" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when asking someone to provide a minimum number of examples or items related to a specific topic. Example: "In your report, please name at least three benefits of renewable energy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

54 human-written examples

If you are like me, you will end up changing your name AT LEAST 4 times.

HuffPost

His shooting prowess and defense impressed Popovich — after, as the story goes, Popovich learned his name, at least.

The New York Times - Sports

Or he remembered their name, at least".

The Guardian - Sport

He has reclaimed his name, at least.

The New York Times

"The name at least became a reminder.

The New York Times - Arts

Now I could name at least four in my sleep".

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

5 human-written examples

In 2002 Ford retired the Continental name -- at least temporarily -- after a decline in sales.

The New York Times - Travel

He was expected to name at least part of his leadership team later in the day.

Los Angeles Times

(He also acquired a new name, at least professionally.

The New Yorker

When Secretary of State John Kerry visited Burma in August he did not utter their name, at least in public.

Huffington Post

This is Hasim Rahman, no household name, at least not yet.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "name at least", ensure the context clearly specifies the category or type of items you expect to be named. This helps avoid ambiguity and ensures the reader understands the task.

Common error

Avoid using "name at least" without specifying what the person should name. For instance, instead of saying "name at least three things", specify "name at least three benefits of exercise" to provide clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "name at least" functions as a directive, instructing someone to identify or specify a minimum number of items or examples. This is supported by Ludwig's examples, which show the phrase used in contexts requiring enumeration or identification.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "name at least" is a grammatically correct and functional directive used to specify a minimum number of items or examples. Ludwig's AI analysis indicates that while the phrase is relatively rare, it is commonly found in both news and academic contexts. It is crucial to provide clear context when using this phrase to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "list at least" or "provide at least" for similar meanings. As Ludwig AI confirms, using "name at least" effectively requires specifying the category or type of items you expect to be named.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

designate at least

Highlights the designation or selection of a certain quantity.

mention at the very least

Emphasizes the act of mentioning a minimum number of items or examples.

cite minimally

Emphasizes the act of citing a minimum number of sources or examples.

identify a minimum of

Stresses identifying a certain threshold quantity.

list no fewer than

Highlights a minimum quantity when listing items or examples.

specify minimally

Focuses on specifying the smallest acceptable number or amount.

provide a bare minimum of

Highlights the provision of the smallest acceptable quantity.

enumerate at a minimum

Stresses enumerating a minimum number of items.

indicate minimally

Focuses on indicating the smallest acceptable number.

offer minimally

Focuses on offering the smallest acceptable number or amount.

FAQs

How can I use "name at least" in a sentence?

Use "name at least" to specify a minimum number of items or examples to be provided. For example, "Please "name at least" three causes of the American Civil War."

What is a good alternative to "name at least"?

Alternatives include "list at least", "provide at least", or "mention at the very least", depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "name at least"?

Yes, "name at least" is grammatically correct. It is used to request a minimum number of items or examples.

What's the difference between "name at least" and "list at least"?

While both are similar, "name at least" implies simply stating or identifying, whereas "list at least" suggests a more structured enumeration. The choice depends on the desired level of formality and detail.