mutual revisions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "mutual revisions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where two or more parties are making changes or edits to a document or project collaboratively. Example: "The authors engaged in mutual revisions to ensure that their ideas were accurately represented in the final manuscript."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Over countless hours of argument and revisions, a mutual admiration blossomed.

The New York Times

1 Examining revisions to expectations on mutual-fund investments and changes in the Standard and Poor stock index, Dominitz and Manski (2003) establish a positive association.

IZA Journal of Migration

Mutual respect and citizenship do not require a radical revision of inequalities.

City, Territory and Architecture

Intelligent revision of norms therefore requires practices of moral inquiry that stress mutual responsiveness to others' claims, and social inclusion of all members of society.

SEP

Revisions continue.

The New York Times

Mutual respect.

Princeton University

Mutual interests.

Stanford University

We had mutual respect, and mutual disagreement.

The New Yorker

Mutual misunderstanding followed.

The Economist

The strangeness was mutual.

The New Yorker

The infatuation was mutual.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In formal writing, consider using "collaborative revisions" as a more readily understood alternative to "mutual revisions".

Common error

Avoid using "mutual revisions" when only one party is making changes, even if those changes are based on feedback from others. "Mutual" suggests an active back-and-forth process, so ensure that's accurate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "mutual revisions" functions as a noun phrase describing the process of making changes together. It implies a collaborative effort where multiple parties contribute to and influence the final version of something, as Ludwig AI states that this expression is correct.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "mutual revisions" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe a collaborative editing process. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s usable in various contexts, though alternatives like "collaborative revisions" may be preferred in certain settings. While the phrase is straightforward, it's important to ensure that its use accurately reflects a genuine back-and-forth exchange between parties, rather than just one-sided modifications based on feedback. Considering the absence of examples, its usage might be considered rare, but its meaning is clear and applicable in scenarios where joint efforts are involved in refining a piece of work.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

collaborative revisions

Replaces "mutual" with "collaborative" to emphasize the joint effort in making revisions.

joint revisions

Uses "joint" instead of "mutual" to highlight the shared nature of the revisions.

shared revisions

Emphasizes the sharing aspect of the revision process between multiple parties.

coordinated changes

Focuses on the coordinated aspect of making changes together.

collective amendments

Replaces "revisions" with "amendments" and "mutual" with "collective" for a more formal tone.

reciprocal alterations

Uses "reciprocal" to suggest that each party's alterations affect the other, and "alterations" instead of "revisions".

interchangeable edits

Highlights that the edits are being done back and forth between parties.

iterative improvements

Implies a step-by-step process of improvements made by multiple parties.

united modifications

Stresses the unified effort in making modifications.

harmonized adaptations

Conveys the idea of adaptations that are being harmonized between parties.

FAQs

What does "mutual revisions" mean?

"Mutual revisions" refers to a process where two or more parties collaboratively make changes or edits to something, such as a document or a plan. It implies a back-and-forth exchange where each party's input influences the other's.

What can I say instead of "mutual revisions"?

Alternatives to "mutual revisions" include "collaborative revisions", "joint revisions", or "shared revisions", depending on the specific context.

Is "mutual revisions" formal or informal language?

"Mutual revisions" is generally considered neutral, suitable for both formal and informal contexts. However, in highly formal settings, phrases like "collaborative revisions" might be preferred.

How do I use "mutual revisions" in a sentence?

You can use "mutual revisions" in a sentence like this: "The authors engaged in "mutual revisions" to ensure that their ideas were accurately represented in the final manuscript."