mutual disagreement

USAGE SUMMARY

"mutual disagreement" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when two or more parties have a disagreement. For example, "The parties involved were unable to come to an agreement, so they had to accept their mutual disagreement."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

We had mutual respect, and mutual disagreement.

The New Yorker

He says the first was in the distant past, a mutual disagreement; and the other two complaints were politically motivated and without basis.

The New York Times

Although statistical analyses showed that the two studies were not in mutual disagreement because of wide confidence limits (Keiding et al. 2003), the apparent disagreement was perceived as a controversy and fueled a debate on uncertainty (Grandjean 1999).

Environmental Health Perspectives

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Jarett Wieselman from New York Post tried to understand what actually went wrong with the production, and came to the conclusion that the mutual disagreements between Gaga and Kahn led to the video being a "piece of rubbish".

Wikipedia

Mutual dislike and political disagreement, something that goes on every day of the week in politics, has been given legs by its treatment as essentially female behaviour.

The Guardian - Opinion

I suspect that it doesn't even occur to them that the tolerant society they claim to want requires dialogue, friendly disagreement and mutual respect.

Huffington Post

Another illustration of the quality of our research is related to criterion 4. In fact, we have already encountered disagreement and mutual misunderstanding at one point.

BMC Health Services Research

The differences in the types of knowledge upon which people living with diabetes base their assessments can lead to disagreement and mutual resentment in which health care providers accuse them of not grasping the severity and implications of their condition, and its life-threatening complications.

BMC Health Services Research

Sustein wrote how "incompletely theorised agreements help illuminate an enduring constitutional puzzle: how members of diverse societies can work together on terms of mutual respect amidst intense disagreements about both the right and the good.

The Guardian

Once the themes had been defined and named, a preliminary thematic map was constructed and two authors (AV, JT) analysed the remaining interviews using this framework, making minor amendments to it following discussion and resolving disagreements through mutual consensus.

BMC Psychiatry

The Church did not confirm the report about the proposed shake-up, but Archbishop Welby said "a 21st-century Anglican family must have space for deep disagreement, and even mutual criticism, so long as we are faithful to the revelation of Jesus Christ, together".

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "mutual disagreement" when you want to emphasize that the disagreement is acknowledged and shared by all parties involved, which often implies a level of understanding or acceptance of the differing viewpoints.

Common error

Avoid using "mutual disagreement" when the disagreement is one-sided or not explicitly acknowledged by all parties involved. Ensure all parties recognize and accept the presence of a disagreement before using this phrase.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "mutual disagreement" functions as a noun phrase, where "mutual" modifies the noun "disagreement". This indicates a shared or reciprocal state of differing opinions or perspectives. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "mutual disagreement" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase that describes a situation where differing viewpoints are acknowledged and accepted by all involved parties. While not highly frequent, as noted by Ludwig, it serves to emphasize a shared understanding of dissent. The phrase is most commonly found in News & Media and Science contexts. When using "mutual disagreement", ensure that all parties involved recognize and accept the difference in viewpoints. Consider alternatives like "shared difference of opinion" or "conflicting views" depending on the context. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is suitable for formal and informal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

shared difference of opinion

Emphasizes that the difference of opinion is held by both parties.

reciprocal dissent

Highlights the back-and-forth nature of the disagreement.

joint non-concurrence

Formal term indicating a lack of agreement between multiple parties.

common contention

Focuses on the shared argument or point of dispute.

bilateral dispute

Highlights the dispute as occurring between two sides.

divergent perspectives

Emphasizes differing viewpoints without necessarily implying conflict.

conflicting views

Focuses on the opposition between the opinions held.

opposing stances

Highlights the contrasting positions adopted by each side.

lack of consensus

Indicates an absence of overall agreement.

discordant opinions

Focuses on the lack of harmony or agreement in opinions.

FAQs

How can I use "mutual disagreement" in a sentence?

You can use "mutual disagreement" to describe situations where two or more parties acknowledge and accept their differing viewpoints. For example, "Despite their "mutual disagreement" on policy, they maintained a respectful working relationship."

What is an alternative to saying "mutual disagreement"?

Alternatives include "shared difference of opinion", "conflicting views", or "lack of consensus" depending on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey. For example, instead of "mutual disagreement" you could use "divergent perspectives".

Is it redundant to say "mutual disagreement"?

While disagreement inherently implies differing views between parties, "mutual disagreement" emphasizes the acknowledgment and acceptance of these differences by all involved. It is not strictly redundant, but rather adds emphasis on the shared understanding of the disagreement.

What's the difference between "mutual disagreement" and "simple disagreement"?

"Simple disagreement" refers to any instance of differing opinions, while "mutual disagreement" highlights that all parties involved are aware of and acknowledge the difference in viewpoints. The former can be unilateral, while the latter implies a "mutual understanding" of the dissent.