Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
mutations to drive
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "mutations to drive" is not correct and lacks clarity in written English.
It may be intended to convey the idea of using mutations to influence or propel a process, but it requires additional context to be fully understood. Example: "Scientists are exploring mutations to drive the evolution of more resilient plant species."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
13 human-written examples
We therefore speculate that their presence may create a pro-oncogenic tissue environment that synergizes with oncogenic mutations to drive the rise in cancer incidence with age.
The genetic screens that led to the discovery of Hippo pathway factors in Drosophila relied on single recessive mutations to drive overgrowth phenotypes (reviewed by Hariharan and Bilder [43]).
First, genes called oncogenes can be activated by mutations to drive unscheduled cell division.
Science
These results indicate that activated Fgfr3 cooperates with other mutations to drive tumorigenesis in a tissue-dependent manner.
It is thus critical to identify these other signalling pathways that cooperate with these presumably initiating mutations to drive cancer.
Science
The potential for germline p53 mutations to drive transactivation at selected miR-associated REs was also examined.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
47 human-written examples
Plasmids were constructed in which exon 3 of TGFBR2 and exon 10 of ACVR2 were cloned +1 bp out of frame, immediately after the translation initiation codon of an enhanced GFP (EGFP) gene, allowing a −1 bp frameshift mutation to drive EGFP expression.
Science
Down-regulation of LKB1 may therefore serve as an alternative to p53 mutation to drive pancreatic cancer in vivo.
Science
Taken together, these data suggest that K-Ras and β-catenin activating mutations do not cooperate with Fgfr3 mutation to drive UCC or to enhance signaling.
In addition, we have also shown that the β-catenin mutation can cooperate with H-Ras mutation to drive superficial bladder cancer (Ahmad et al., 2011b).
Moreover, identifying the cooperating molecular events that occur alongside FGFR3 mutation to drive UCC will aid the development of genetic models of UCC to test combinatorial therapies.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Consider using more grammatically standard alternatives such as "mutations that lead to" or "mutations causing" for clearer and more effective communication. Precision in scientific writing is crucial for avoiding ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using overly concise phrasing like "mutations to drive" which may lack clarity. Always prioritize grammatical accuracy and readability over brevity, especially in formal or scientific writing, to ensure your message is understood as intended.
Source & Trust
78%
Authority and reliability
3.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "mutations to drive" functions as a purpose connector, attempting to link mutations with their intended effect. Ludwig AI notes that this phrasing is not grammatically correct and lacks clarity, suggesting a need for more precise language.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "mutations to drive" aims to express the causative role of mutations in influencing or propelling a process, particularly in scientific contexts. However, Ludwig AI identifies the phrase as grammatically incorrect and lacking clarity. While examples exist, especially within scientific literature, it's advisable to use more grammatically standard alternatives such as "mutations that lead to" or "mutations causing" to ensure precision and avoid ambiguity. Prioritizing accurate and clear communication will enhance the effectiveness of scientific and formal writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
mutations that lead to
Replaces "to drive" with a more direct causal link, emphasizing the outcome of the mutations.
mutations that cause
A stronger causal connection, indicating the mutations directly bring about a result.
mutations responsible for
Highlights the mutations' role in bringing about a specific effect or condition.
mutations that contribute to
Suggests the mutations are one factor among others in a larger process.
mutations that promote
Implies mutations encourage or facilitate a certain outcome.
mutations that trigger
Emphasizes the mutations as a starting point or catalyst for a process.
mutations that induce
Suggests the mutations bring about a change or condition through their effect.
mutations that initiate
Focuses on the mutations' role in starting a process or event.
mutations resulting in
Highlights the outcome as a direct result of the mutations.
mutations that foster
Suggests mutations nurture or help develop a certain condition or process.
FAQs
What are some alternatives to "mutations to drive"?
You can use alternatives like "mutations that lead to", "mutations that cause", or "mutations responsible for" depending on the context.
Is "mutations to drive" grammatically correct?
No, according to Ludwig AI, the phrase "mutations to drive" is considered grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity in written English.
How can I use the phrase "mutations to drive" in a sentence?
While not grammatically ideal, you might see it in informal contexts. However, it's best to use more precise language such as "mutations that contribute to" or "mutations that promote" for clarity.
What is the difference between "mutations to drive" and "mutations that lead to"?
The phrase "mutations that lead to" is a grammatically correct and clearer way of expressing that mutations cause or result in a particular outcome, whereas "mutations to drive" is considered grammatically incorrect.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
78%
Authority and reliability
3.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested