mutations are comparable

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "mutations are comparable" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the similarities or differences between various mutations in a scientific or biological context. Example: "In our study, we found that certain mutations are comparable in their effects on protein function, leading to similar phenotypic outcomes."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

A potential problem with this reasoning is the implicit assumption that gene expression, the accessibility of exoproducts to non-producers and the fitness consequences of mutations are comparable in vitro and in vivo, and in acute and chronic infection contexts.

Nature

Their methods to analyse germline mutations are comparable with those used in our study.

British Journal of Cancer

The ΔΔ GU values for [R16nva] mutations are comparable to, or significantly larger, than those due to acidification (see Table 1).

Biochemistry

This is consistent with recent data that indicated that the respective frequencies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are comparable in early onset breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Research

This suggests that the dependence of fitness on free energy is described by a smooth landscape in which the deleterious effects of many non-epitope mutations are comparable in magnitude to the beneficial effects of epitope changes.

Genetics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

When tested for complementation or multicopy suppression of the defective Sso1p or Sso2p, the functionality of mutant proteins containing all mutations was comparable to that of the wt proteins in vivo (Figure 2A, Table 1).

Plosone

The rates of KRAS mutations were comparable in CIMP-high (35.3%) and CIMP-low/negative carcinomas (34.1%).

BMC Cancer

The occurrence of various types of mutations is comparable to other studies of this size [ 21, 24, 26, 27], but some differences are also apparent.

BMC Cancer

These results reveal that the frequency of EMS-induced transition and transversion mutations is comparable between different individual mutants that were derived from the same mutagenized population.

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

The specificity and sensitivity of the other four methods for protein-truncating mutations were comparable to those of full sequencing ('gold standard').

Breast Cancer Research

However, despite these differences in the Ras protein (H-RasQ61L or K-RasG12D) and the levels of expression of the mutant, the cooperation of the either K-Ras or H-Ras mutations were comparable.

Cell Death and Disease

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing mutations, be specific about the criteria you are using for comparison. For instance, specify whether you are comparing their effects on protein function, their frequency, or their location in the genome.

Common error

Do not assume that because some "mutations are comparable" in one aspect, they are identical in all respects. Always specify the context of the comparison to avoid misleading interpretations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "mutations are comparable" functions as a descriptor, indicating a similarity or equivalence between different mutations. As Ludwig AI shows, this phrase is used to highlight shared characteristics or effects in scientific or biological contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "mutations are comparable" is a descriptor used in scientific contexts to indicate that different mutations share similar characteristics or effects. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used in academic and research settings. While the phrase is useful for highlighting similarities, it's important to be specific about the criteria for comparison and avoid overgeneralization. Alternatives such as "mutations are similar" or "mutations are alike" can be used depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

mutations are similar

Focuses on the likeness between mutations rather than direct comparison.

mutations are alike

Emphasizes the shared characteristics of the mutations.

mutations are analogous

Highlights the parallel or corresponding nature of the mutations.

mutations are equivalent

Suggests the mutations have the same effect or value.

mutations have similar effects

Shifts the focus to the consequences of the mutations.

mutations exhibit comparable characteristics

More formal phrasing emphasizing shared characteristics.

mutations share common traits

Highlights the shared traits or features among mutations.

the mutations are on par

Implies that the mutations are at the same level or degree.

mutations are of a similar nature

Emphasizes the similar underlying nature of the mutations.

mutations are broadly equivalent

Acknowledges some differences, but highlights overall equivalence.

FAQs

How can I use "mutations are comparable" in a sentence?

You can use "mutations are comparable" to indicate that different mutations share similar characteristics or effects. For example, "These "mutations are comparable" in their impact on cell growth".

What does it mean when "mutations are comparable"?

When "mutations are comparable", it means that they share similar features or effects, allowing them to be compared or equated in some way. The specific criteria for comparison should be clearly defined.

What can I say instead of "mutations are comparable"?

You can use alternatives like "mutations are similar", "mutations are alike", or "mutations are analogous" depending on the context.

In what contexts is it appropriate to say "mutations are comparable"?

It's appropriate in scientific and technical writing when discussing genetics, biology, or medicine, and you want to point out similarities between different mutations. It helps establish a basis for understanding shared mechanisms or outcomes.