Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
In embedded agar, the hda1Δ/Δ mutant showed poor filamentation.
The hda1Δ/Δ mutant showed poor filamentation compared to the wild-type strain on most solid media tested (Figure 1).
However, when a later marker of the endocytic route was used, CD63 characteristic of the phagolysosome, SO2 mutant showed poor colocalization with this marker, displaying a persistence phenotype as described previously by our group for murine macrophages [12].
The ("3xA") mutant showed poor light-dependent induction (Supporting Information Figure S2a) and was not further characterized.
After the recovery period of 3 days, camta1 mutant showed poor survivability (39% of camta1-2 and 42% of camta1-3) while more than 86% of Col-0 plants survived and continued to grow after giving water.
Similar(55)
Another VAC14 mutant showing poor Fab1p activation had defects in HEAT domains 2 and 3: its Vac7p and Atg18p interactions were defective, but it interacted with Fig4p normally.
At 35°C, sec9-7 mutantshoweded poor growth and failed to form individual colonies, while sec9-7 vmutantsuble mutants grew and formed individual colonies (Figure 3b).
This result was consistent with ORF75c mutants showing poor BAC cassette-based eGFP expression (Fig. 3C), since the HCMV IE1 promoter driving eGFP expression operates quite independently of endogenous MuHV-4 transcription [36], [37].
Mutants showing poor data quality are marked by red bars.
Mutant mice showed poor rotarod performance and gait disturbances.
A mutant cipk15 line showed poor anaerobic germination and seedling growth under submerged conditions (Lee et al. 2009).
Related(15)
mutant showed weak
mutant showed low
mutant showed deficient
mutant showed vigorous
mutant showed reduced
mutant showed dramatic
mutant had poor
mutant showed short
mutant showed full
mutant showed semi-sterile
mutant showed stunted
mutant showed significant
mutant showed normal
variants showed poor
line showed poor
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com