must provide

USAGE SUMMARY

'must provide' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when something is required or necessary, or when something is obligatory. For example, you could say, "Employers must provide a safe working environment for their employees."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Banks must provide collateral.

The New York Times

Must provide own twins.

Independent

Laws must provide stability.

The Economist

Art must provide light.

The Guardian - Film

Instead, they must provide only "suitable" investments.

The New York Times

By law, hospitals must provide emergency care.

The New York Times

All municipalities must provide preschool classes.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Doctors and hospitals must provide estimates.

The New York Times - Health

Saudi officials must provide answers.

The Washington Post

Governments must provide treatment services and information.

The Guardian - Opinion

The final bill must provide broader coverage.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "must provide" in legal or formal contexts, ensure that the obligation is clearly defined and enforceable.

Common error

While "must provide" is grammatically correct, it can sound overly formal or forceful in casual conversation. Consider using softer alternatives like "should offer" or "need to give" in less formal settings to maintain a more conversational tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "must provide" functions as a modal verb phrase, indicating a strong obligation or necessity. Ludwig examples demonstrate its use in expressing legally binding requirements, moral duties, and essential actions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Academia

25%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

15%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "must provide" is a powerful and versatile tool for expressing strong obligations and requirements. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely used across various contexts. Its primary function is to impose a duty or necessity, making it suitable for legal documents, business communications, and academic writing. While highly effective in formal settings, it's important to consider the tone and register, opting for softer alternatives in casual conversations. Remember to use "must provide" when clarity and enforceability are paramount.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is required to provide

This alternative directly states the requirement to provide something, emphasizing the obligatory nature.

is obligated to supply

Similar to "is required to provide", this phrase uses "obligated" to underscore the binding nature of the provision.

has a duty to furnish

This alternative uses "duty" to highlight the moral or legal responsibility to furnish something.

needs to offer

This suggests a necessity to offer something, though it may not be as forceful as "must".

is bound to give

Using "bound" indicates a commitment or promise to give something, implying a strong obligation.

is compelled to present

This emphasizes the forceful nature of the requirement, indicating that someone is compelled to present something.

should be furnishing

This suggests an expectation or recommendation that something should be furnished.

is expected to deliver

This implies that there is an expectation that something will be delivered.

is set to contribute

This alternative indicates a planned or scheduled contribution, implying a degree of obligation.

is slated to allocate

Suggests a scheduled or designated allocation, implying a prior arrangement.

FAQs

How do I use "must provide" in a sentence?

Use "must provide" to indicate a requirement or obligation. For example, "The company "must provide" employees with adequate safety training".

What are some alternatives to "must provide"?

Alternatives include "is required to provide", "is obligated to supply", or "has a duty to furnish" depending on the context.

Is "must provide" formal or informal?

"Must provide" leans towards the formal side, indicating a strong obligation. In informal contexts, consider alternatives like "needs to give" or "should offer".

What's the difference between "must provide" and "should provide"?

"Must provide" indicates a strict requirement, whereas "should provide" suggests a recommendation or suggestion. The choice depends on the level of obligation you want to convey.