must address

USAGE SUMMARY

'must address' is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to express an obligation or requirement. For example: "We must address the issue of global warming as soon as possible."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We must address this".

The New York Times

Marsch must address it.

The Guardian - Sport

"Those questions you must address to government.

Independent

And we must address that.

The Guardian

World leaders must address it.

The Guardian

Mr. Bush must address poverty.

The New York Times

And we must address the tax code.

The New York Times

We must address this in full force.

The New York Times

"They must address their structural weaknesses.

The New York Times

This is an issue we must address.

The Guardian - Opinion

We must address these issues now.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "must address", ensure the context clearly defines what needs to be addressed and why it is important. This adds clarity and strengthens the urgency of the message.

Common error

Avoid using "must address" without specifying what issue needs attention. Vague statements weaken the impact. Instead of saying "We must address this", specify, for example, "We must address the lack of affordable housing by increasing funding for community development programs."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "must address" functions as a modal verb phrase expressing a strong obligation or necessity. According to Ludwig AI, it's used to indicate that something needs to be dealt with or resolved. Examples show it's used when conveying that action is imperative.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

14%

Less common in

Academia

10%

Social Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "must address" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to convey the necessity of resolving a problem or issue. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's applicable across various contexts, particularly in news, science, and formal business settings. Related phrases include "needs to tackle" and "should resolve", offering similar connotations. Best practices advise specifying what needs to be addressed for clarity. Common errors include vague usage without context. This detailed analysis provides a thorough understanding of the phrase's usage, alternatives, and appropriate contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

needs to tackle

Focuses on confronting and resolving the issue directly.

should resolve

Suggests a recommendation or advisability to resolve the issue.

has to handle

Emphasizes the obligation and management of a situation.

is required to fix

Highlights the mandatory aspect of correcting or repairing something.

is essential to solve

Stresses the importance and necessity of finding a solution.

ought to correct

Indicates a moral duty to rectify the situation.

should take care of

Implies a responsibility to manage and resolve a problem.

is important to consider

Highlights the need for thoughtful attention and deliberation.

demands attention

Stresses the urgency of a problem requiring immediate action.

warrants consideration

Suggests the issue deserves careful evaluation and thought.

FAQs

How do I use "must address" in a sentence?

Use "must address" to emphasize the necessity of dealing with a problem or issue. For example, "The government "must address" the rising unemployment rate." It indicates an obligation or urgent need for action.

What are some alternatives to "must address"?

You can use alternatives like "needs to tackle", "should resolve", or "has to handle" depending on the context and the level of formality you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "have to address" instead of "must address"?

Yes, "have to address" is a grammatically correct alternative. While "must address" indicates a stronger sense of obligation, "have to address" also conveys necessity. The choice depends on the specific context and desired emphasis.

What is the difference between "should address" and "must address"?

"Should address" suggests a recommendation or advisability, while ""must address"" indicates a stronger obligation or requirement. "Should" implies it's a good idea to address something, while "must" implies it's essential.