Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
multiple testing correction
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "multiple testing correction" is correct and usable in written English.
It is commonly used in the field of statistics and research to refer to the practice of adjusting statistical results for conducting multiple hypothesis tests. Example: The researchers used a Bonferroni correction to account for the problem of multiple testing, ensuring the accuracy of their results.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
bAdjusted P-values was corrected of nominal P-values by Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing correction.
Science
P values were corrected using the Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate multiple testing correction procedure.
Science
This approach requires rigorous multiple testing correction.
False discovery rate (FDR) multiple testing correction was also performed.
Science
Methods for multiple testing correction and their application are described.
Science
Multiple testing correction analysis was not applied, and all unassigned reads were ignored.
Science
Multiple testing correction was performed using the Benjamini-Hochberg algorithm.
Science
The target gene set of miR-181a remained significant after multiple testing correction (FDR = 0.048).
Science
The authors thank Dr. Sabina Bijlsma (TNO, the Netherlands) for help with multiple testing correction analysis.
Science
The analysis was performed assuming a hypergeometric distribution and using the Bonferroni multiple testing correction.
Science
Key statistical and multiple testing correction methods used by each tool are shown in Table S8.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When reporting statistical results, always specify which "multiple testing correction" method was applied (e.g. Bonferroni, Benjamini-Hochberg) for transparency and reproducibility.
Common error
Failing to apply a "multiple testing correction" when conducting multiple statistical tests can lead to an inflated rate of false positives, making your findings unreliable.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "multiple testing correction" functions as a noun phrase that describes a statistical procedure. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. It's used to refer to the methods employed to adjust p-values in studies involving multiple hypothesis tests.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "multiple testing correction" is a crucial statistical technique used to address the problem of inflated false positive rates when conducting multiple hypothesis tests. Ludwig AI validates its grammatical correctness and its frequent usage in scientific literature. Common methods include Bonferroni, Benjamini-Hochberg, and Sidak corrections. It's vital to specify the method used when reporting results. Failing to apply a "multiple testing correction" can lead to unreliable conclusions. Always remember to adjust your statistical analyses when performing multiple comparisons to ensure the integrity of your research.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
adjustment for multiple comparisons
Focuses on the act of adjusting results rather than the overall process of correction.
multiple comparisons adjustment
Reorders the words for a slightly different emphasis, but retains the core meaning.
correction for multiple comparisons
Swaps "testing" with "comparisons", highlighting the comparison aspect of the tests.
false discovery rate control
Specifies the goal of the correction, which is to control the false discovery rate.
family-wise error rate control
Highlights a specific method of controlling error rates across multiple tests.
statistical significance adjustment
Broadens the concept to any adjustment made to statistical significance due to multiple tests.
p-value adjustment
Refers specifically to adjusting p-values to account for multiple comparisons.
controlling type I error
Emphasizes the reduction of type I errors (false positives) as the purpose of the correction.
significance level correction
Addresses the adjustment of the significance level to maintain accuracy.
Bonferroni correction
Names a specific, common method used for multiple testing correction.
FAQs
What is "multiple testing correction" and why is it necessary?
"Multiple testing correction" refers to statistical methods used to adjust p-values when performing multiple hypothesis tests. It's necessary to control the false discovery rate and avoid incorrectly concluding that effects are significant.
What are some common methods for "multiple testing correction"?
Common methods include the "Bonferroni correction", "Benjamini-Hochberg procedure" (FDR control), and "Sidak correction". The choice depends on the desired balance between controlling false positives and false negatives.
How does "multiple testing correction" affect p-values?
"Multiple testing correction" typically makes it more difficult to achieve statistical significance by raising the threshold that a p-value must cross. This adjustment reduces the likelihood of false positives.
When should I use "multiple testing correction"?
You should use "multiple testing correction" whenever you are conducting multiple statistical tests on the same dataset. This is especially important in exploratory analyses where many comparisons are made.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested