Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(29)
To adjust for potential multi-testing, p-Values for significance were corrected for the number of comparisons using Sidak correction factor (α = .05, number of comparisons = 12, mean correlation among outcome variables = .30, and degrees of freedom = 55).
m, One-way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparison correction for process length and segments and two-way ANOVA with Sidak correction for multiple comparisons for number of intersections.
Pairwise comparisons, with Sidak correction, revealed no differences between any time points for the MF-Group.
Multiple comparisons were adjusted with Sidak correction Fig. 3 Estimated marginal means for HIT-6 scores across time for Mindfulness and Pharmacology groups.
Pairwise post-hoc comparisons were performed with unpaired-samples t-test, Mann-Whitney test or chi-square test, as appropriate; in all cases we used a Sidak correction.
Therefore, we used the Bonferroni correction, respectively its exact version (the Sidak correction), both adjusting for the fact that the probability of a type I error in a multiple test differs from the error probability in a single test.
Similar(31)
We took a conservative approach to correct for multiple testing, using the Dunn-Sidak correction, by correcting for the total number of GO-terms associated with probe sets on the array rather than just the number of terms associated with probe sets in a cluster.
Repeated t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons were used to assess for differences between groups.
In case of 'n' pair wise comparisons, Dunn-Sidak correction was applied, resulting in adjusted individual p' values: p' = 1- 1-p 1/n, in which p = 0.050 to obtain a family-wise error rate of 5%.
We applied Dunn-Sidak correction [75] for multiple forest-ecotone comparisons, within regions, for the six traits showing a significant association with tree cover (α = 0.05; α' = 1−(1−α)1/6 = 0.0085).
Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com