Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
Our results show that for most diagnostic groups, there is little variation in survival between regions.
There was a tendency for slight but nonsignificant elevations in risk for most diagnostic groups.
The adjusted analyses in Table 4 show statistically significant negative trends for maternal smoking during pregnancy for most diagnostic groups.
For most diagnostic groups, there was little variation in survival between regions, except for testicular germ cell tumours (P=0.006) and colorectal carcinoma (P=0.002).
Females who had relapsed had a slightly (but not significantly) greater risk of death than males, in contrast to the usual finding that females survive longer than males for most diagnostic groups (Coleman et al, 1999); this requires confirmation in other populations.
Similar(55)
Some of the analyses focused on the five most prevalent diagnostic groups, to gain more statistical power.
Most common diagnostic groups were general surgery (31%), orthopaedic surgery (20%) and neurosurgery (9.6%).
Table 4 shows the mean (incl. SD) and median duration of illness of the four most important diagnostic groups.
This is the first prospective study to show that the most affected diagnostic groups may change over time.
Previous studies have also shown that psychiatric problems are among the most common diagnostic groups accounting for high sickness absence [ 22, 28].
Age adjusted incidence and mortality rates were calculated for all malignancies combined and for each of the most common diagnostic groups, using five-year age specific rates.
Related(20)
most clinical groups
most diagnostic categories
most nonprofit groups
most important groups
most feminist groups
most vulnerable groups
most diagnostic alterations
most zygomorphic groups
most environmental groups
most diagnostic labs
most diagnostic decisions
most diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals
most diagnostic requirements
most reviled groups
most diagnostic tests
most popular groups
most influential groups
most diagnostic nucleotides
most diagnostic centers
most diagnostic methods
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com