Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
The words preceded by morphological primes were recognized 119 ms faster than those preceded by non-related primes.
Nevertheless, in studies where the SOA was longer, words preceded by morphological primes were recognized faster than words preceded by a pseudo-derived prime.
The words preceded by morphological primes were recognized 86 ms faster than those preceded by non-related primes, and were recognized 109 ms faster than those preceded by orthographic primes.
In this school grade, when compared to words preceded by orthographic primes or by non-related primes, words preceded by morphological primes were recognized faster in the 250-ms SOA and in the 60-ms SOA.
When compared to words preceded by orthographic primes, words preceded by morphological primes were recognized 86 ms faster in the 250-ms SOA and 76 ms faster in the 60-ms SOA [t 37) = 3.69, p < 0.01 and t 37) = 2.42 p = 0.02, respectively].
When compared to words preceded by non-related primes, words preceded by morphological primes were recognized 76 ms faster in the 250-ms SOA [t 37) = 2.67, p = 0.01] and 62 ms faster in the 60-ms SOA (p = 0.059 being just significant).
Similar(54)
One of the variables that might modulate morphological priming is the SOA.
The results indicate that the difference between non-related prime and morphological prime was significant when the SOA was 250 ms: t 31) = 2.62, p = 0.01.
The effect of morphological priming was operationalized as the difference between the reaction time for words preceded by morphological primes and the reaction time for words preceded by orthographic primes or non-related primes, divided by the standard deviation of overall reaction time.
The behavioral data showed significant effects of morphological and semantic priming, with the magnitude of morphological priming being significantly larger than the magnitude of semantic priming.
For the two shortest SOAs, only morphological and pseudo-derivative primes had effects, that is, target words preceded by these primes were recognized faster.
Related(20)
morphological traits were
morphological implications were
morphological identifications were
morphological characters were
morphological characteristics were
morphological filters were
morphological shifts were
morphological markers were
morphological populations were
morphological studies were
morphological structures were
morphological datasets were
morphological reconstructions were
morphological changes were
morphological properties were
morphological investigations were
morphological features were
morphological affinities were
morphological patterns were
morphological measurements were
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com