Suggestions(5)
Exact(6)
The most representative morphological patterns were chosen to conduct this work.
These morphological patterns were attributed to mutualist coevolutionary processes with flowers.
The morphological patterns were almost identical between AI-Ste5p ste2Δ and AI-Ste5p sst2Δ (Figure 6C), suggesting that the ability to form multiple projections in AI-Ste5p ste2Δ was because of elevated basal heterotrimeric G-protein activity [25], which also led to an enhanced transcriptional response.
Neuropathological assessment of six cases with the C9ORF72 repeat expansion demonstrated a heterogeneous profile, in that both FTLD-TDP type A and type B morphological patterns were represented.
When morphological patterns were examined among transects with this procedure, no differences were found in the magnitude of morphological evolution exhibited across transects for either P. jordani or for P. teyahalee (Table 2).
Different morphological patterns were observed in DCIS: 4 were cribriform (1 low grade, 3 intermediate grade), 9 papillary (2 low grade, 7 intermediate grade), 4 micropapillary (2 low grade, 1 low grade, 1 high grade), 6 solid (1 low grade, 1 intermediate grade, 4 high grade) and 5 were comedo type DCIS (5 high grade).
Similar(54)
Morphological patterns are focal and diffuse.
A rich variety of morphological patterns are predicted and analyzed.
These morphological patterns are beyond the reach of the classical phenomenological theory of martensitic crystallography (PTMC).
The intensities of these phenological events were estimated using the semi-quantitative scale of Fournier (Fournier 1974) and identification of the morphological patterns was made according to the classification proposed by Newstrom (Newstrom et al. 1994).
No special self-accommodating morphological patterns are observed on the (0001)α2 plane, which is very different from the pattern formation predicted for the coherent hexagonal → O-phase transformations.
More suggestions(15)
morphological change were
morphological implications were
morphological identifications were
morphological characteristics were
morphological characters were
morphological shifts were
morphological filters were
morphological markers were
morphological populations were
morphological studies were
morphological datasets were
morphological structures were
morphological reconstructions were
morphological properties were
morphological investigations were
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com