more staff

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "more staff" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the need for additional personnel in a workplace or organization. Example: "To handle the increased workload, we will need to hire more staff."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

More staff are needed.

The Economist

We still need more staff.

The Guardian

There's more staff involvement.

The Guardian

There's always a need for more staff.

The New York Times

We need to bring more staff in.

The Guardian

There are more staff meetings, more discussions.

The New York Times - Sports

They need more staff at counters.

The New York Times

"This work requires more staff than visitors," he said.

The New York Times - Arts

Brewing capacity is to be doubled and more staff hired.

Independent

More staff members were added Tuesday, reducing delays.

The New York Times - Sports

It will apply to people with more staff.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When requesting "more staff", clearly articulate the specific roles and responsibilities needed to justify the expansion. For example, instead of simply stating "we need more staff", specify "we need more staff trained in data analysis to handle the increased workload".

Common error

Don't assume that simply asking for "more staff" will solve underlying problems. First, analyze workflow inefficiencies or skill gaps to determine the root cause, and then justify the need for additional personnel with specific data and reasoning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "more staff" functions primarily as a noun phrase indicating a requirement for an increased number of personnel. As seen in the Ludwig examples, it's often used in discussions about resource allocation, organizational needs, or service delivery.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "more staff" is a common and grammatically correct way to express the need for additional personnel. Ludwig AI confirms its widespread use across various contexts, particularly in News & Media and Science, indicating its versatility and relevance. When using "more staff", it's important to clearly articulate the specific requirements and roles needed, as opposed to making vague requests. Alternatives such as "additional personnel", "increased workforce", and "expanded team" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Therefore, while "more staff" is a simple and effective phrase, consider the context and intended meaning to ensure the most appropriate choice of words.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

additional personnel

Replaces "staff" with a more formal term, "personnel".

increased workforce

Focuses on the labor force aspect, implying a general increase in workers.

expanded team

Highlights the collaborative aspect, implying the group of people is growing.

augmented crew

Similar to "expanded team" but used when describing a group working closely together.

hire more employees

Emphasizes the action of recruiting more staff members.

recruit additional workers

Similar to 'hire more employees' with the more formal "recruit".

bolster the team

Implies strengthening the existing team with new members.

increase staffing levels

Focuses on the overall number of staff members.

supplement the workforce

Suggests adding to an existing workforce to fill gaps or meet increased demand.

onboard new hires

Focuses on integrating newly hired staff into the existing organization.

FAQs

How can I use "more staff" in a sentence?

You can use "more staff" to indicate a need for additional personnel. For example, "The hospital needs "more staff" to cope with the increasing number of patients.".

What are some alternatives to saying "more staff"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "additional personnel", "increased workforce", or "expanded team".

Is it correct to say "more staffs"?

No, the correct plural form of "staff" in this context is "staff". Using "staffs" is generally incorrect when referring to personnel.

What's the difference between "more staff" and "more employees"?

"More staff" is a general term referring to the personnel of an organization. "More employees" is more specific, referring to individuals who are formally employed. While often interchangeable, "staff" can sometimes include volunteers or contractors in addition to employees.