more responsibilities to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "more responsibilities to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing an increase in duties or tasks assigned to someone, often in a professional context. Example: "With the promotion, she will have more responsibilities to manage the team effectively."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

22 human-written examples

Organisations have removed layers of management and devolved more responsibilities to staff at the front line.

The Guardian

Now, most companies have turned from amorous suitors into stern parents — shifting more costs, and more responsibilities, to their employees.

The New York Times

Authoritarian regimes would maintain control over certain aspects of internal affairs, like defense, and gradually turn over more responsibilities to an elected government.

The New York Times - Magazine

Mr. Kelly has consistently said he will work to drive crime down even further, despite having several thousand fewer officers and more responsibilities to try to prevent further acts of terrorism.

The New York Times

The government's reaction to scandals has been to give more responsibilities to Neds and to increase the burden of compliance on boards, which can leave them exposed and over-stretched.

The Guardian

It would, they believe, revive and retrofit the Reagan revolution -- by putting new spending constraints on the federal government with the tax cut; by ceding more responsibilities to state and local governments and religious institutions; and by transforming two great monuments of the New Deal and the Great Society, with partial privatizing of Social Security and Medicare.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

36 human-written examples

"My inclination was to transfer more responsibility to Iraqis early.

The New Yorker

It takes much more responsibility to speak for yourself".

The New York Times - Arts

That's the kind of person that I want to really give more responsibility to".

The New Yorker

And it espouses a philosophy of continuous improvement by delegating more responsibility to workers.

The Economist

Doctors do not like his proposal to give more responsibility to physicians' assistants and nurse midwives.

The New York Times - Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "more responsibilities to", ensure the context clearly indicates who is receiving the increased duties and what those duties entail for effective communication.

Common error

Avoid using "more responsibilities to" without specifying the target recipient of those responsibilities. Clarity prevents confusion and ensures effective delegation or understanding of new roles.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "more responsibilities to" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating an increase in duties or obligations directed towards a specific person, group, or entity. Ludwig provides examples in various contexts, confirming its proper grammatical usage.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

59%

Science

27%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "more responsibilities to" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression for indicating an increase in duties or obligations toward a specific target. According to Ludwig, it is deemed correct and usable in written English. Predominantly found in news and media, scientific, and formal business contexts, this phrase effectively communicates the shifting of accountability or expanded roles. While alternatives like "greater obligations for" or "increased accountability toward" exist, the core meaning remains consistent. When employing this phrase, clarity is paramount to avoid ambiguity. Overall, "more responsibilities to" serves as a versatile tool for clearly expressing the distribution of tasks and accountabilities across various domains.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

greater obligations for

Focuses on the formal duties and commitments involved.

increased accountability toward

Emphasizes the aspect of being answerable or responsible for outcomes.

additional duties for

Highlights the supplementary nature of the tasks.

expanded roles within

Suggests a broadening of one's functions or activities.

enhanced tasks for

Implies an upgrade or improvement in the assignments.

added burdens upon

Conveys the sense of increased weight or pressure.

new mandates over

Indicates freshly assigned orders or directives.

further commitments with

Stresses the additional pledges or engagements undertaken.

broader scope within

Highlights the widening range or extent of responsibilities.

delegated tasks toward

Emphasizes the process of assigning tasks to someone.

FAQs

How can I use "more responsibilities to" in a sentence?

You can use "more responsibilities to" to indicate an increase in duties or tasks assigned to someone. For example, "The promotion gave her "more responsibilities to" manage the team effectively."

What are some alternatives to "more responsibilities to"?

Some alternatives include "greater obligations for", "increased accountability toward", or "additional duties for", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "more responsibility for" instead of "more responsibilities to"?

While "more responsibility for" is grammatically correct and commonly used, "more responsibilities to" emphasizes the direction or recipient of the increased duties. The best choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

What's the difference between "more responsibilities to" and "more duties for"?

"More responsibilities to" highlights an increase in the scope of tasks and obligations specifically directed towards someone or something, while "more duties for" simply indicates an increase in the tasks one must perform.