more powerful association

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "more powerful association" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a relationship or connection that has a greater impact or influence compared to others. Example: "The study revealed a more powerful association between stress levels and heart disease than previously thought."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

This conclusion may of course change as ever more powerful association studies are conducted.

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Therefore, SNP genotyping platforms capable of determining the genotypes at a larger number of SNP loci are required to perform more powerful association studies in soybean.

BMC Plant Biology

Under certain conditions, the HWD test could be a more powerful association method than conventional family-based and population-based case-control association analyses, for which, the present study provides an extreme example.

Behavioral and Brain Functions

Indeed, we previously reported more powerful association with 30-day and 1-year mortality after ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) for admission blood glucose concentration, compared to the diagnosis of diabetes.

BMJ Open

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Several authors have attempted to identify secondary loci using more powerful association-based methods.

Annals of Neurology

Our cutoff points were constructed arbitrarily by dividing our cohort into tertiles, but it is probable that much more powerful associations with outcome would be found using additional discriminatory analyses such as the maximal log-rank test (Peto et al, 1977).

British Journal of Cancer

Simulations indicate that our proposed approach is more powerful than association tests that are based on each separate sample.

The American Journal of Human Genetics

However, when odds ratios at individual loci are ≥3, or there are many independent risk variants, linkage is more powerful than association [7].

Plosone

In this sparse-genotype-based study, admixture mapping was more powerful than association mapping on individual SNP genotypes because it efficiently utilized neighboring markers to infer the ancestry component.

Plosone

Because admixture mapping uses neighboring SNP information to estimate the ancestry component, it gives stronger signal near a causal gene (i.e., Waxy) and is often more powerful than association mapping with sparse genotype data, particularly when there are no SNPs in LD with the causal SNP.

Plosone

Where the aetiological variant is not typed, haplotype-based analysis is more powerful for association studies in which there is significant LD in the region of interest.

Arthritis Research and Therapy

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing associations, specify the context or criteria that make one association "more powerful" than another. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "more powerful association" without specifying the variables or factors involved. For example, instead of saying "there is a more powerful association", specify what two things are more powerfully associated and under what conditions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "more powerful association" functions primarily as a comparative descriptor, indicating a stronger or more influential relationship between two or more entities. As indicated by Ludwig, it is used to denote a connection that is more potent or significant than others.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "more powerful association" is a grammatically sound and useful expression to describe a stronger or more influential connection, primarily within scientific and academic contexts. As confirmed by Ludwig, its usage emphasizes the significance of a relationship relative to others. When employing this phrase, ensure you specify the variables involved and the criteria that define the enhanced power of the association. While the phrase is relatively uncommon, it accurately conveys the intended meaning when used appropriately.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

stronger correlation

Emphasizes a statistical relationship that is more pronounced.

greater influence

Focuses on the increased impact or effect of one thing on another.

enhanced relationship

Highlights the improved or intensified connection between two or more things.

more significant link

Indicates a connection that is more important or noteworthy.

deeper connection

Suggests a more profound or meaningful relationship.

more marked correlation

Highlights a correlation that is more noticeable or evident.

more compelling link

Implies a connection that is more convincing or persuasive.

more pronounced effect

Focuses on an impact that is more distinct or noticeable.

more intense relation

Suggests a stronger or more concentrated relationship.

more substantial impact

Highlights a greater or more significant effect.

FAQs

How can I use "more powerful association" in a sentence?

You can use "more powerful association" to describe a stronger relationship between two variables, such as "The study revealed a "more powerful association" between exercise and reduced risk of heart disease".

What's the difference between "more powerful association" and "stronger correlation"?

While both phrases suggest a significant relationship, ""more powerful association"" implies a broader influence or impact, whereas "stronger correlation" specifically refers to a statistical measure of the relationship between two variables.

What can I say instead of "more powerful association"?

You can use alternatives like "stronger relationship", "greater influence", or "more significant link" depending on the context.

Is it always better to have a "more powerful association" in research?

Not necessarily. While a ""more powerful association"" can indicate a stronger relationship, it doesn't automatically imply causation or practical significance. It's important to consider the context, potential confounding factors and the magnitude of the effect.