more good than

USAGE SUMMARY

"more good than" is a valid phrase and can be used in written English.
It is typically used when comparing two things or actions and stating that one is better or more beneficial than the other. Here is an example sentence: "The decision to invest in renewable energy is more good than simply relying on traditional fossil fuels."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

More good than harm.

Independent

Some trees do more good than others.

The New York Times - Magazine

There's a lot more good than bad.

The New York Times - Sports

But it does more good than harm".

The New York Times

Will it do more good than harm?

The New York Times

All of which might do liberalism more good than harm.

The Economist

(Wong's stories were sometimes more good than true).

The New Yorker

That's more good than most economists can hope to accomplish.

The Economist

But autonomous robots could do much more good than harm.

The Economist

Did Mao really do more good than harm?

Independent

She did more good than me down there, I'm sure.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "more good than", ensure that the context clearly identifies what is being compared. Be specific about the benefits and drawbacks to make the comparison more impactful.

Common error

Avoid using "more good than" without clearly defining what aspects are considered "good". The comparison can become unclear if the criteria for goodness are not explicit.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "more good than" functions as a comparative, used to evaluate and contrast the relative benefits of two or more options or actions. As Ludwig AI points out, it implies a judgment where the positive aspects outweigh the negative ones.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Science

18%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "more good than" is a versatile and frequently used comparative expression. As Ludwig AI has shown, it serves to highlight the superior benefits of one option over another. While grammatically straightforward and generally correct, clarity is key: ensure you clearly define what "good" entails in your comparison. This phrase is common across various contexts, particularly in News & Media, and offers a way to advocate for choices that provide a greater net positive outcome. Be mindful of potential vagueness and always specify the criteria for 'goodness' to make the comparison more impactful.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

does more good than harm

Directly contrasts the good and bad aspects, suggesting a net positive effect.

better than

Simple and direct comparison indicating a preference or higher value.

more beneficial than

Replaces "good" with a more formal synonym, emphasizing the positive effects.

more helpful than

Highlights the supportive or assistive qualities.

more advantageous than

Highlights the competitive edge or favorable circumstances provided.

greater benefit than

Shifts the focus to the magnitude of the positive outcome.

more valuable than

Focuses on the worth or importance of something in comparison to something else.

outweighs the harm

Emphasizes that the positive aspects are more significant than the negative.

net positive impact

Highlights the overall positive effect after considering all factors.

superior to

Implies a higher quality or effectiveness compared to something else.

FAQs

How can I use "more good than" in a sentence?

Use "more good than" to compare the positive aspects of one thing to another, such as, "Investing in education does "more good than" cutting funding for schools".

What's a simpler way to say "more good than"?

You can use phrases like "better than", or "more beneficial than" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it always clear what constitutes "good" when using "more good than"?

No, it's important to specify the criteria for "good" to ensure the comparison is clear and meaningful. Without clear criteria, the statement can be vague.

Which is correct, "more good than harm" or "more good than bad"?

Both are correct, but "more good than harm" directly contrasts benefits and drawbacks, while "more good than bad" is a more general comparison of positive and negative aspects.