Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

more efficient for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"more efficient for" is a correct phrase and can be used in written English.
It is usually used when comparing different methods or options for achieving a task or goal. Here are two examples: 1. "Using a digital planner is more efficient for scheduling appointments than a paper planner." 2. "Walking is more efficient for short distances, while biking is more efficient for longer distances."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We've also made things more efficient for our customers.

News & Media

The Guardian

This makes the system much more efficient for the consumer.

On the contrary it is more efficient for us".

News & Media

Independent

TiCl3 is more efficient for desorption and CeCl3 for absorption.

This system, Uber argues, will be more efficient for shippers and more attractive to drivers.

This process is more efficient for formation of bacterial than for fungal aerosols.

Science & Research

Nature

It can be argued that conventional mobile apps are more efficient for many tasks.

The UN might be more efficient for that purpose - but only just.

News & Media

The Guardian

Is it more efficient for Puerto Rico to import much of its food?

Paying with plastic is technically more efficient for everyone than paying with checks or cash.

News & Media

The New York Times

"Another 50 percent pick up pieces — how to make your operating tables more efficient, for example.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "more efficient for", clearly specify what the subject is more efficient for. Avoid vague statements and provide context to highlight the benefits.

Common error

Avoid using "more efficient for" without a clear comparison. Always specify what alternative is less efficient to provide a complete understanding.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "more efficient for" functions as a comparative adjective phrase, indicating that one thing performs better than another in relation to a specific purpose or recipient. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

36%

News & Media

34%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

9%

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "more efficient for" is a grammatically sound and widely used comparative construction, designed to emphasize the superior effectiveness of one option over another in a specific context. Ludwig AI validates its correctness, showing its versatility across scientific, news, academic, and business domains. To ensure clarity, explicitly state what the subject is more efficient for. Be careful of overgeneralization without a clear comparison. Related phrases such as "better suited for" and "more effective for" can be used as alternatives. Overall, "more efficient for" is a valuable tool for precise and impactful communication.

FAQs

How can I use "more efficient for" in a sentence?

Use "more efficient for" to compare the effectiveness of one method or tool against another in achieving a specific goal. For example, "Using a database is "more efficient for" managing large amounts of data than using spreadsheets".

What are some alternatives to "more efficient for"?

Alternatives include "better suited for", "more effective for", or "more advantageous for" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "more efficient for"?

Yes, "more efficient for" is grammatically correct. It is used to describe something that performs a task with less wasted resources compared to another option.

What is the difference between "more efficient for" and "better for"?

"More efficient for" specifically relates to resource utilization, while "better for" is a broader term that can encompass various aspects such as ethical considerations or overall suitability. Something can be "more efficient for" a task but not necessarily "better for" the environment.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: