Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
Increasing the core diameter of the SPIONs but keeping the surface ligand the same could also result in a more dynamic corona.
It is clearly seen that, as surface ligand hydrophobicity increased a more dynamic corona would be formed, recruiting a larger portion of the rapidly exchanging proteins.
For the carboxylated SPIONs used in our study, a ligand having higher hydrophobicity or a larger particle diameter would be referred, because both would lead to a more dynamic corona.
By varying the surface hydrophobicity of the SPIONs with a core size around 10 nm, we found out that, the more hydrophobic surface ligand attracted proteins with higher surface hydrophobicity and formed a more dynamic corona with a larger portion of the involved proteins with fast exchange rates.
The more dynamic corona on the larger SPIONs was also confirmed using a 15 nm SPION coated with the same amphiphilic polymer as the 10- and 25-AMP (15-AMP), carried a similar zeta-potential of −41.15 ± 0.21 mV to those two, and had the intermediate core (15 nm, Supporting Information Figure S8 for TEM image) and hydrodynamic (19 nm) sizes.
Similar(54)
Mission data allowed scientists to identify several different types of flares, and demonstrated that the corona away from regions of peak activity was much more dynamic and active than had previously been supposed.
He's more dynamic.
Kolarov is even more dynamic.
This is much more dynamic.
It is more dynamic, more inegalitarian.
Johnson, in particular, looked more dynamic.
Related(20)
more dynamic domestic
more dynamic connection
more significant corona
more dynamic fashion
more dynamic story
more dynamic player
more dynamic medium
more distal corona
more dynamic fluid
more dynamic product
more dynamic plan
more dynamic leadership
more dynamic flow
more dynamic texture
more dynamic programming
more dynamic region
more dynamic team
more dynamic pruning
more dynamic export
more abundant corona
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com