more cost-effective

USAGE SUMMARY

"more cost-effective" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to something that costs less than an alternative but still provides the same or similar benefit. For example, "Investing in energy-efficient windows was a more cost-effective option than replacing the entire home's windows."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

38 human-written examples

"And it would be more cost-effective".

The New York Times

There are more cost-effective programs.

University of California, Berkeley

Is individualized medicine more cost-effective?

Nature

We need cleverer, more cost-effective ways to engage people".

The Guardian

Some products are simply more cost-effective than others.

The New York Times

Instead they will have to use more cost-effective ingenuity.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

22 human-written examples

It is more cost effective.

The New York Times

They're also more cost effective.

The Guardian

Which is more cost effective or important?

The Guardian

They may actually prove to be more cost effective.

The New York Times

-Why might a low GVWR be considered more cost effective?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing options, clearly quantify the benefits of choosing the "more cost-effective" one. Use specific numbers to show the savings or increased value.

Common error

Don't automatically equate lower cost with "more cost-effective". Consider the long-term benefits, durability, and potential hidden costs before making a decision.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "more cost-effective" functions as a comparative adjective. It modifies a noun, indicating that one option is superior to another in terms of its value relative to its cost. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is a correct and usable expression.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

13%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "more cost-effective" is a valuable tool for clear and persuasive communication. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and applicable when comparing options to highlight the superior value in relation to cost. While seemingly straightforward, it's crucial to remember that cheaper isn't always better; "more cost-effective" considers the broader picture of long-term benefits and efficiency. As exemplified by the varied sources in Ludwig, the phrase finds relevance across diverse sectors like news, science, and business. Remember to quantify the benefits and avoid assuming that the lowest price automatically equates to the best value.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

more economical

Focuses on financial savings; less emphasis on efficiency.

more economical option

Adds the dimension of choice or selection process.

better value for money

Highlights the quality-price ratio rather than just lower cost.

more budget-friendly

Highlights affordability, suitable for consumer contexts.

more efficient

Emphasizes optimized resource use, not exclusively cost.

more resource-efficient

Stresses efficient use of resources beyond just cost savings.

more profitable

Concentrates on increased earnings, broad financial benefit.

better return on investment

Stresses the return relative to the cost invested.

less expensive

Focuses solely on lower price, neglecting efficiency gains.

more streamlined

Highlights process optimization; relates indirectly to cost.

FAQs

How to use "more cost-effective" in a sentence?

Use "more cost-effective" to compare two or more options, indicating one provides better value for the money spent. For example, "Investing in renewable energy is "more cost-effective" in the long run than relying on fossil fuels".

What can I say instead of "more cost-effective"?

You can use alternatives like "more economical", "more efficient", or "better value for money" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "cost-effective" or "more cost-effective"?

"Cost-effective" describes something that provides good value, while "more cost-effective" is used to compare options, indicating one is better in terms of value for money.

What's the difference between "cheaper" and "more cost-effective"?

"Cheaper" simply means lower in price, while "more cost-effective" implies a better balance between cost and benefits. A cheaper option isn't always "more cost-effective" if it sacrifices quality or long-term value.