more comprehensive replies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "more comprehensive replies" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to responses that provide greater detail or thoroughness on a particular topic. Example: "In order to improve our communication, I would appreciate more comprehensive replies to my questions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Before I could reply, her son politely confirmed that this visit had been more comprehensive.

The New York Times - Health

We need more comprehensive data".

The New York Times - Sports

It is actually more comprehensive.

Encyclopedia Britannica

believed would be a more comprehensive study.

The New York Times - Sports

Kayak's results are more comprehensive.

The New York Times

One that was more comprehensive with penalties.

The New York Times

HURRICANE coverage is also getting more comprehensive.

The New York Times - Travel

Paytrust (www.paytrust.com) offers a more comprehensive service.

The New York Times - Tech

Victory could not have been more comprehensive.

The Guardian - Sport

Looking for a more comprehensive security system?

The Washington Post

Other companies are building more comprehensive solutions.

Harvard Business Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When requesting "more comprehensive replies", be specific about the areas needing more detail. This helps ensure the responses meet your expectations.

Common error

Don't assume a reply is comprehensive simply because it's lengthy. Ensure it addresses all key aspects and provides sufficient detail to answer the core questions or concerns.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "more comprehensive replies" functions as a descriptor, modifying the noun "replies". It indicates that the replies are not just answers, but thorough and all-encompassing responses. Ludwig AI confirms this structure and usability.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "more comprehensive replies" is a grammatically correct phrase used to request or emphasize the need for thorough and detailed answers. While Ludwig AI validates its structure, its frequency is currently missing in the provided dataset. To ensure your request is well-received, provide context and clarity about the need for detailed information. When requesting more information, similar phrases like ""more detailed responses"" or "more exhaustive answers" can be useful alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

more exhaustive answers

Focuses on the thoroughness and completeness of the answers.

more detailed responses

Emphasizes the level of detail provided in the responses.

more thorough feedback

Highlights the completeness and attention to detail in the feedback provided.

more complete answers

Stresses the entirety and lack of missing information in the responses.

more elaborate responses

Suggests that the responses are more complex and fully developed.

more extensive feedback

Implies that the feedback covers a wider range of topics or aspects.

more in-depth answers

Highlights that the answers delve deeper into the subject matter.

fuller responses

Indicates that the responses are more complete and have less missing content.

more all-inclusive answers

Emphasizes that the answers cover every relevant aspect.

more insightful replies

Indicates that the replies offer deeper understanding and perception.

FAQs

How can I ask for "more comprehensive replies" without sounding demanding?

Frame your request by explaining why you need the extra detail. For example, “To fully understand the situation, I would appreciate "more detailed responses".”

What's the difference between "more comprehensive replies" and "more detailed replies"?

"More comprehensive replies" suggests a broader scope, covering all relevant aspects. "More detailed replies" implies a greater level of specificity within the given scope. Both can be used, but it depends on whether you need breadth or depth.

Is it always better to get "more comprehensive replies"?

Not necessarily. Sometimes, conciseness is preferable. Request "more comprehensive replies" when thoroughness and completeness are essential, but be mindful of the recipient's time and the context.

What are some alternatives to asking for "more comprehensive replies" in a professional setting?

Consider using phrases like "a more thorough explanation", "additional details", or "a fuller account". These alternatives can be more polite and specific, depending on the context.