more at stake

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "more at stake" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that there are greater risks or consequences involved in a situation. Example: "In this negotiation, there is more at stake than just the financial terms; the future of our partnership depends on it."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Arts

Sports

Opinion

Politics

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"There's more at stake".

The New York Times

It also has more at stake.

The New York Times

And there might be more at stake.

The New York Times

But there is more at stake.

The Economist

There is more at stake, too.

The New Yorker

There is more at stake.

The New York Times

They have more at stake".

The New York Times - Arts

It seems like there's more at stake.

The New York Times

But there is far more at stake.

The Guardian - Opinion

There is more at stake now.

The New York Times - Sports

But the university had more at stake.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "more at stake" when you want to emphasize that the potential consequences of a situation are significant, encompassing not just immediate outcomes but also broader implications.

Common error

While "more at stake" is widely applicable, avoid using it excessively in casual conversation. Simpler phrases like "it's important" or "it matters" may be more appropriate for everyday situations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "more at stake" functions as an idiomatic expression used to indicate that the potential consequences or risks involved in a particular situation are significant or heightened. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and frequent usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Sports

10%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

10%

Encyclopedias

10%

Wiki

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "more at stake" is a versatile and frequently used expression to highlight the significance and potential consequences of a situation. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and appears across a range of contexts, including News & Media, Sports, and Formal & Business settings. Alternatives like "higher stakes" and "greater risk" can be used depending on the nuance you wish to convey. Remember that while it's generally suitable for both formal and informal communication, simpler alternatives might be preferable in casual settings. By understanding its usage and potential pitfalls, you can effectively use the phrase "more at stake" to add emphasis and gravitas to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

higher stakes

Focuses more directly on the level of risk or reward involved.

greater risk

Emphasizes the potential for negative consequences.

more to lose

Highlights the potential loss or detriment that could occur.

much is at risk

Similar to "more at stake" but can increase the sense of danger.

significant consequences

Focuses on the potential outcomes of a situation.

serious implications

Similar to "significant consequences", but can refer to longer-term or less visible effects.

a lot depends on it

Highlights the importance of a particular outcome or action.

critical importance

Emphasizes the high degree of significance a matter holds.

a matter of urgency

Highlights the need for immediate action because of the significance of the matter.

high priority

Indicates that a situation or issue is very important and requires immediate attention.

FAQs

How can I use "more at stake" in a sentence?

You can use "more at stake" to emphasize that the potential consequences of a situation are significant. For example, "In this election, there's "more at stake" than just political power; the future of our society is on the line."

What are some alternatives to saying "more at stake"?

You can use alternatives such as "higher stakes", "greater risk", or "more to lose" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "much at stake" instead of "more at stake"?

While "much at stake" is grammatically correct, "more at stake" is generally preferred and more common. "Much at stake" can sound slightly more formal or emphatic.

What's the difference between "more at stake" and "at risk"?

"More at stake" implies that there are significant consequences or potential losses involved in a situation. "At risk", on the other hand, specifically highlights the possibility of danger or harm. You might say "There's "more at stake" in this negotiation than just money" to suggest broader implications, whereas "Our reputation is "at risk"" focuses on potential harm to reputation.