Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
All participants were surveyed by questionnaire, and their quality of life and mood were measured at baseline and 10 weeks.
Self-esteem and mood were measured at the start and end of the protocol immediately after the recovery period.
Fatigue, disability, pain and mood, were measured differently in the UK and the Netherlands, making it difficult to compare these characteristics directly.
Distress and negative mood were measured at four time-points: two during diagnostic testing and two after a negative biopsy result.
Fatigue, disability, pain and mood were measured differently in the UK and the Netherlands, making it difficult to directly compare these characteristics.
Positive and negative aspects of mood were measured with two widely used, psychometrically sound standard scales: the Positive Affect subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (19) and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress subscales of the 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (20).
Similar(54)
Measurements: Alcohol dependence severity was measured using the SADQ, mood was measured with the POMS-SF and a computerised emotional Stroop task was employed to measure attentional bias.
Depressed mood was measured using the Moods and Feelings Questionnaire short version (Angold et al. 1995).
Depressive mood was measured by means of the Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (GDS-15) [ 40].
Depressed mood was measured with the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [ 27].
Mood was measured using 18 bipolar visual analogue scales or VAS.
Related(20)
humour were measured
mood were evaluated
mood were compared
attitude were measured
tone were measured
mood were assessed
heart were measured
mood were chosen
mood were monitored
mood were anchored
mood were observed
mood were noticeable
mood were pooled
mood were associated
mood were obtained
mood were repeated
mood were loaded
mood were questioned
mood were collected
mood were perceived
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com