Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
modification levels were
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "modification levels were" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the varying degrees or stages of modification in a particular context, such as research, analysis, or technical documentation. Example: "The results indicated that the modification levels were significantly higher in the experimental group compared to the control group."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
5 human-written examples
Various mutants of KDM5B-myc proteins were expressed in 293T cells, and the histone modification levels were analyzed by immunofluorescent staining with (A) H3K4me3 and (B) H3K4me2 specific antibodies.
Science
The quantified modification levels were correlated with the translational efficiency by means of an in vitro translation system.
Histone modification levels were analysed using probes from 500 bp upstream to 500 bp downstream of transcription start sites (TSS).
Science
Histone's modification levels were normalized against total H3 detected and the ratio of modified-H3 to H3 was denoted as relative enrichment.
Science
The sites with significantly variable A-to-G modification levels were subjected for hierarchical clustering, revealing clear tissue selectivity with higher modification levels in the GFL tissue and low levels in the VL tissue.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
55 human-written examples
Histone modification levels are spatially auto-correlated.
Science
Modification levels are, by and large, uniform across tissues coming from the same individual animal.
Science
The R of a single regression of all housekeeping genes on the 70 histone modification levels is only.2677.2677
Science
Histone modification levels are dynamic and are due to net changes in the activity of modifying enzymes called "writers" and "erasers" [ 39].
Science
When transcription factor binding and histone modification levels are mapped in the same state (cell line, condition) they appear highly correlated.
Science
Note that in both panels only sites with significantly variable modification levels are presented (binomial analysis was performed with Bonferroni-corrected p-value of 0.05 as a cutoff), each row represents one modification site.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When discussing experimental results, clearly specify the type of modification being measured and the units used to quantify the "modification levels were". This adds precision and clarity to your findings.
Common error
Avoid using "modification levels were" without specifying the type of modification. This can lead to ambiguity. Instead, specify the modification, such as "methylation levels were" or "phosphorylation levels were".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "modification levels were" functions as a descriptor in scientific and technical contexts, indicating the extent to which something has been altered. As Ludwig AI suggests, it is used to analyze and quantify the degree of change.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "modification levels were" is a grammatically sound and technically relevant expression, primarily used in scientific and academic contexts to quantify the extent of alterations. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it serves to describe and analyze the degree to which changes have occurred. While the phrase is accurate and functional, specificity is key. To avoid ambiguity, always specify the type of modification being discussed (e.g., methylation, phosphorylation) and the units of measurement. Alternatives such as "degrees of modification" or "magnitudes of change" may suit different contexts, but "modification levels were" remains a precise and suitable choice in formal scientific writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
degrees of modification were
Replaces "levels" with "degrees" to emphasize the extent or intensity of the modifications.
extents of alteration were
Substitutes both "modification" and "levels" with "alteration" and "extents", focusing on the degree of change.
magnitudes of change were
Emphasizes the size or significance of the changes rather than the specific modifications themselves.
intensities of adjustment were
Highlights the strength or force behind the adjustments made.
scopes of variation were
Focuses on the range or breadth of the variations observed.
stages of modification existed
Focuses on the progressive states of change, implying a sequence of alterations.
alteration quotas were
Emphasizes that alteration or change have been performed based on quotas.
modification proportions were
Highlights the relative amount of modifications.
rectification indexes were
Emphasizes the degree of the change or fix measured in indexes.
amendment shares were
Focuses on the shares of changes to reach a certain level.
FAQs
How do I use "modification levels were" in a sentence?
Use "modification levels were" to describe the extent or degree to which something has been altered or changed. For example, "Histone modification levels were analyzed to determine their impact on gene expression".
What can I say instead of "modification levels were"?
You can use alternatives like "degrees of modification were", "extents of alteration were", or "magnitudes of change were" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "change levels were" instead of "modification levels were"?
While "change levels were" is grammatically correct, "modification levels were" is more precise when referring to specific alterations made to something, especially in scientific or technical contexts.
What's the difference between "modification levels were" and "modification rates were"?
"Modification levels were" refers to the measured amount or degree of change, while "modification rates were" refers to the speed or frequency at which the changes occurred.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested