modest efficacy and

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "modest efficacy and" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that a particular approach, effort, or action has had some success, but not a great deal of success. For example, "Our marketing campaign has had modest efficacy and resulted in a small number of new customers."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

Currently available antiarrhythmic drugs are limited by modest efficacy and significant toxicity.

Heart Rhythm

Angiogenesis inhibitors are important for cancer therapy, but clinically approved anti-angiogenic agents have shown only modest efficacy and can compromise wound healing.

Cell Reports

Unfortunately, the currently available therapies designed to improve cognition (i.e., for AD and other forms of dementia) are limited by modest efficacy and adverse side effects, and their effects on cognitive function are not sustained over time.

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Interferon alfa-based regimens used to treat recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation are poorly tolerated, associated with generally modest efficacy, and can interact with immunosuppressive agents.

Duke University

Our results are consistent with studies suggesting that neuraminidase inhibitors have modest efficacy and should be optional for healthy adults during typical influenza seasons yet recommended for high risk adults and epidemic situations with more virulent strains [17], [18], [19].

Plosone

However, VX-809 alone has shown only modest efficacy and failed to improve lung functions in CF patients.

Biochemistry

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

As adherence decreased, formulation became more important than modest efficacy changes and injections were preferred to daily pills (p<.05).Psychiatrists favored treatments that primarily improve positive symptoms.

Duke University

Evidence-based pharmacological medications have modest efficacy [ 51] and even doctors experience frustration with IBS, due as much to medical uncertainty and shortage of effective interventions as to intolerance of the personal characteristics of IBS patients [ 50].

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Furthermore, meta-analyses of currently approved medications have shown only modest efficacy for pain and have not shown efficacy on other domains [ 19, 21, 22], and population studies have not demonstrated that FM medications have had any meaningful effect on outcomes over time [ 23].

Arthritis Research and Therapy

Guanfacine, another α-2 adrenergic agonist, has modest efficacy in reducing tics and in improving attention in children and adolescents.

European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Meridia's safety woes and modest efficacy are part of a long history of disappointing efforts by the drug industry to cure the obesity epidemic and cash in on the estimated $59 billion that Americans spend annually fighting fat.

The New York Times - Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "modest efficacy and", ensure that the subsequent context clearly indicates what the limitations or potential drawbacks are. Providing specific details enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "modest efficacy and" if the actual results demonstrate negligible or no effect. Overstating the benefits can mislead the audience and undermine credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "modest efficacy and" functions as a qualifying conjunction, linking the concept of limited effectiveness to further considerations, such as side effects or the need for further research. According to Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Academia

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "modest efficacy and" is a grammatically correct and usable expression, as confirmed by Ludwig AI, primarily employed in formal and scientific contexts. It serves to indicate a degree of effectiveness that is limited or not substantial. Predominantly found in scientific literature, as seen in the Ludwig examples, it connects the concept of limited positive results with additional considerations. When using this phrase, ensure to provide context about specific limitations to maintain clarity and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

limited effectiveness and

Replaces "efficacy" with "effectiveness", emphasizing the restricted degree of success.

weak efficacy and

Uses "weak" instead of "modest", conveying a lower level of effectiveness.

moderate effectiveness and

Substitutes "modest" with "moderate", suggesting a slightly higher degree of efficacy but still not substantial.

some effectiveness and

Indicates the presence of effectiveness, but not to a great extent.

marginal effect and

Replaces "efficacy" with "effect", highlighting the minimal impact or outcome.

limited impact and

Similar to "slight impact", but perhaps slightly stronger in connotation.

slight impact and

Focuses on the small influence or effect produced.

partial success and

Highlights that the success achieved was incomplete or not total.

restricted utility and

Indicates that the phrase has efficacy but it is limited in its application.

humble performance and

Replaces "efficacy" with "performance", emphasizing the unremarkable results.

FAQs

How can I use "modest efficacy and" in a sentence?

You can use "modest efficacy and" to describe treatments or interventions that show some positive effect but are not highly effective. For example: "The new drug showed "modest efficacy and" requires further study to enhance its impact".

What are some alternatives to saying "modest efficacy and"?

Alternatives include phrases like "limited effectiveness and", "moderate effect and", or "marginal impact and", which all convey a similar sense of restricted success.

Is it appropriate to use "modest efficacy and" in formal writing?

Yes, "modest efficacy and" is suitable for formal writing, particularly in scientific or academic contexts, where it's important to accurately represent the degree of effectiveness.

What's the difference between "modest efficacy and" and "high efficacy and"?

"Modest efficacy and" implies a limited positive effect, while "high efficacy and" indicates a substantial and significant positive effect. The choice depends on the actual results you are describing.