modest contract

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "modest contract" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a contract that is not overly ambitious or large in scope, often implying a reasonable or limited agreement. Example: "The company decided to enter into a modest contract with the freelancer to complete the project within a specified timeframe."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Sports

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

Better yet for the Seahawks, Wilson is locked into an extremely modest contract.

The Guardian - Sport

He also settled a protracted contract dispute with the city's teachers, giving large raises in exchange for modest contract concessions.

The New York Times

With expensive commitments to Alex Rodriguez, C. C. Sabathia, Mark Teixeira and others, Johnson's modest contract was a bonus.

The New York Times

But Phillips was working on another deal for a younger pitcher whom the Mets liked for his sinker and the modest contract he already had signed for the next two years.

The New York Times - Magazine

There are no signs his role will increase the rest of this season, or next season, when it's likely he will return to the Giants for the fourth year of a relatively modest contract.

The New York Times - Sports

When the Chicago Bears announced in March that they would not budge from their relatively modest contract offer to keep linebacker Brian Urlacher, the standard-bearer of their defense for 13 seasons, he treated it like a chop block to his knees.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

In a normal year, a player like Beeler would have received several calls after the draft, with teams offering modest contracts and camp invitations.

The New York Times - Sports

Otherwise in pursuit of remuneration their cricketers had to settle for relatively modest contracts – by modern standards – amid the sweat and toil of county cricket.

The Guardian - Sport

A few weeks ago, it appeared that the decision might come down to Ewing, Anthony Roberson or Mardy Collins, who all have modest contracts.

The New York Times - Sports

Players generally sign modest contracts (with housing usually included) lasting the duration of the seven-month season, after which they're on their own financially.

The Guardian - Sport

Sri Lanka only started offering modest contracts and paying small match fees — $100 in the one-day international format used in the World Cup — for female players in 2011, but success has followed.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing contracts in business or sports contexts, use "modest contract" to emphasize cost-effectiveness or a lower financial commitment compared to other agreements.

Common error

Avoid using "modest contract" when the agreement involves significant long-term implications or strategic importance, even if the immediate financial investment seems small. Be mindful of the overall impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "modest contract" functions primarily as a noun phrase, where "modest" acts as an adjective modifying the noun "contract". It denotes a contract that is limited in scope, value, or ambition. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Formal & Business

25%

Science

10%

Less common in

Sports

10%

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "modest contract" is a grammatically sound and semantically clear expression used to describe an agreement that is not overly expensive or ambitious. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. It's most commonly found in news, business, and sports contexts, where it serves to convey a sense of limited financial commitment or reasonable scope. While suitable for formal writing, remember to avoid using it when the contract holds significant long-term implications. Alternatives include "small-scale agreement" or "limited contract", which offer slight nuances in meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

limited contract

Focuses on the constraints and boundaries of the contract.

small-scale agreement

Emphasizes the limited size and scope of the agreement.

moderate agreement

Highlights the reasonable and balanced nature of the agreement.

low-value contract

Directly refers to the monetary worth or financial significance of the contract.

unambitious contract

Suggests the contract lacks high goals or far-reaching objectives.

reasonable contract

Focuses on the just and fair terms of the contract.

economical contract

Highlights the cost-effectiveness of the contract.

budget-conscious contract

Emphasizes the focus on staying within a specific budget.

conservative contract

Indicates a cautious and restrained approach to the contractual agreement.

contained agreement

Highlights the limited extent of the arrangement.

FAQs

How can I use "modest contract" in a sentence?

You can use "modest contract" to describe a contract that is not overly expensive or ambitious. For example, "The company offered him a "modest contract" to start, with opportunities for increases based on performance."

What are some synonyms for "modest contract"?

Alternatives to "modest contract" include phrases like "small-scale agreement", "limited contract", or "low-value contract", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "modest contract" in formal writing?

Yes, "modest contract" is appropriate for formal writing, especially in business, sports, and legal contexts. It clearly conveys the idea of an agreement that is not substantial or extravagant.

What is the difference between "modest contract" and "standard contract"?

"Modest contract" refers to the size or value of the contract, suggesting it's not a large or expensive agreement. A "standard contract", on the other hand, refers to a contract that follows a typical format or template, without necessarily implying anything about its value.