Ai Feedback
Exact(8)
The sensitivity of FSP + CVHI + inflammatory cytokine and CVHI + inflammatory cytokine models was higher than 90%.
Reliability of EMG-force relationship models was higher within than between days, but typically acceptable for all but the lowest contraction intensities, and enables adjustment for measurement imprecision in future studies.
The performance of the rule-based (RB) models was higher than expected by chance for species occurring in less than 70% of the sites (k>0.4) and was relatively consistent across the three areas of England where they were tested.
Employing ASTER satellite data, the relative RMSE obtained for all three volume models was higher than for the models developed in our study: 28.54% for k-NN, 25.86% for SVM, and 26.86% for RF, and only the RF algorithm produced unbiased volume estimations.
Burgueño et al. (2012) found that the predictive ability of genomic-based models was higher than that of pedigree-based models.
The agreement between CAR and both LUR models was higher for the 13 large-area campaign sites in Amsterdam (R = 89%) than for the 62 city-specific campaign sites (R = 75%).
Similar(52)
The quality of the models was highest for AS, followed by axial SpA and nrSpA.
The performance of the 20 models was high in 10-fold cross-validation of AUC (0.959 ± 0.010, mean ± sd).
The contributions using multiple regression models are higher than are the ones for single regression models.
Among them, the probabilities of 19 models were higher than 0.005.
It shows that GSSR models are higher in precision and more complex compared with GSR models.
Related(20)
systems was higher
samples was higher
ones was higher
specimen was higher
choices was higher
specimens was higher
predictions was higher
examples was higher
sample was higher
template was higher
kind was higher
example was higher
later was higher
models showed higher
models was weaker
models exhibited higher
models were higher
models predicted higher
models had higher
model was higher
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com