Ai Feedback
Exact(8)
In more complex models, individuals with latent infection that have yet to display detectable signs of infection may also be included in the healthy category.
In all models individuals with partially missing item level data were included, since estimation of missing data patterns is possible under traditional ML and WLSMV.
In all models, individuals with partially missing item level data were included, since estimation of missing data patterns is possible under both estimators (traditional ML and WLSMV).
In both models individuals with very high cholesterol were perceived to be at the highest risk of having a coronary event.
For multivariate models, individuals with prior CVD were defined as those with one or more condition listed under "cardiovascular event history or conditions" or taking CVD drugs in Table 1; hypertensives were excluded from this definition.
In stratified models, individuals with the highest levels of CRP (BMI ≥ 30) showed significant associations for five of six exposure characterization indices, and effect estimates were generally consistent with between 22.7 and 41.8percentt differences in CRP.
Similar(52)
Based on this model, individuals with higher CYP1A1 activity would be at increased risk of cancer when exposed to high levels of smoke components.
In addition, as evidence of a moderation model, individuals with low social anxiety and low EA reported the least anger suppression; no significant differences were found for individuals with high social anxiety.
Consistent with the persuasion knowledge model, individuals with higher levels of PTPK were shown to have more knowledge-related thoughts regarding pricing tactic information than those with low levels of PTPK.
According to the suggested model individuals with a strong SOC would show less variability of SOC over time [ 3].
In a multivariate model, individuals with low SRH were at higher risk of mortality (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.73) than those with high SRH.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com